Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured template skill with concrete workflow steps and a precise output contract. Its main gaps are the lack of an explicit verification step and that all referenced bundle files (example.html, LICENSE, template.json, assets/) are missing from the package.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files (example.html, LICENSE, template.json, assets/) so the workflow's first step is executable.
Add a final verification step to the workflow, e.g. 'Open the deck and confirm fonts render, the palette is unchanged, and page-number labels are updated.'
Consider a one-line 'Quick start' that shows cloning example.html and the artifact wrapper together for faster orientation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and competent — it never explains what HTML/decks/fonts are; sections like 'At a glance', 'Avoid for', and the six-step workflow each earn their tokens with actionable specifics. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: a numbered workflow (clone example.html, replace placeholders, preserve fonts/palette, duplicate layouts) plus an exact '<artifact identifier=... type="text/html">' output contract. As an instruction-only skill, absence of code is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced, but there are no explicit validation or verification checkpoints (e.g. confirm the deck renders, fonts load, palette preserved), and anchor 3 requires explicit validation steps. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and references are clearly signaled (./LICENSE, template.json, example.html), but every referenced bundle file is absent from the package, so the navigation points to missing materials rather than real one-level-deep content. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |