CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

impeccable-design-polish

Follow-up design polish skill inspired by Impeccable. Use after a web or HTML artifact exists to audit, critique, polish, animate, harden, and prepare the page for a live/share pass.

63

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/impeccable-design-polish/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-structured follow-up skill with unusually concrete anti-slop guidance (specific AI tells and harden targets). Its weakness is workflow sequencing: the operating rules are principles rather than an ordered pass, and validation of fixes is implicit rather than an explicit checkpoint.

Suggestions

Turn the Operating Rules into an ordered pass with an explicit validation checkpoint, e.g. '1. Inspect the artifact in a browser; 2. Fix the top issues; 3. Re-open the page and verify overflow, contrast, and states before finishing'.

Add measurable criteria to the harden and accessibility guidance, such as a WCAG contrast threshold (e.g. 4.5:1 body text) and a motion-duration bound, so fixes are verifiable rather than judgment calls.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient: short mode bullets, a tight numbered rule list, and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place; the only near-fluff phrase ('closer to something a designer would ship') still conveys the intent of the pass.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout: named AI tells ('purple-blue glow gradients with no product reason', 'generic 3-card feature rows', 'oversized rounded cards everywhere') and named harden targets ('mobile overflow, text clipping, contrast problems, missing states, broken links'). Falls short of anchor 5 because it gives no operational criteria or commands — e.g. no contrast threshold, motion duration bounds, or a way to verify fixes — leaving some judgment calls open.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Operating Rules imply a sequence (inspect first, preserve intent, make decisive fixes, remove AI tells, preserve accessibility, end runnable), but it reads as principles rather than a sequenced pass. Validation checkpoints are implicit — 'final visual QA' appears only under the Live mode, and there is no explicit verify step (e.g. re-check contrast or test the page in a browser) between fixing and finishing.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is under 50 lines, well organized into clear sections (Follow-Up Modes, Operating Rules, Best Pairings), and no bundle files exist or are needed — verified that references/, scripts/, and assets/ are absent and all body pointers are to other skills by name, not to files. Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections alone warrant anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid description that clearly states its follow-up positioning, covers both what and when, and includes several natural trigger terms. Its main weakness is that the action verbs are broad mode names rather than concrete capabilities, and the 'when' clause lacks concrete trigger phrases.

Suggestions

Replace generic mode verbs with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'audit visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and contrast; remove generic AI-slop patterns (purple-blue gradients, 3-card feature rows); fix mobile overflow and text clipping' instead of 'audit, critique, polish, animate, harden'.

Add concrete trigger phrases to the when clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to polish, refine, critique, or de-AI an existing web page or HTML artifact, or to prepare it for a live review or share pass'.

Include natural synonyms users actually say — 'refine the design', 'clean up the UI', 'make it look designed', 'fix the layout' — to broaden trigger coverage without adding jargon.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Follow-up design polish... after a web or HTML artifact exists') and lists six action verbs ('audit, critique, polish, animate, harden, and prepare the page for a live/share pass'), but each is a broad mode name rather than a concrete technical action. Not score 4 because the verbs lack the operational specificity of anchor 4's examples; not score 2 because the domain is clearly named with multiple actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both what ('audit, critique, polish, animate, harden, and prepare the page') and when ('Use after a web or HTML artifact exists') are explicitly present. The when clause is explicit but could be more specific with concrete trigger phrases like 'when the user asks to polish or refine an existing page', so it matches anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural terms a user would say: 'design polish', 'audit', 'critique', 'animate', 'harden', 'web or HTML artifact', 'live/share pass'. Missing a few common variations such as 'refine the UI', 'clean up the design', or 'make it look professional', which keeps it below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The follow-up positioning ('Follow-up design polish skill... after a web or HTML artifact exists') carves a distinct post-generation niche with minimal conflict risk. Minor overlap remains with general design/frontend and animation skills that also answer 'critique design' or 'animate page' style requests, matching anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

nexu-io/open-design

Path

skills/impeccable-design-polish/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.