Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-structured, giving a concrete layout spec and a clear workflow ending in an output contract. It is slightly more descriptive than executable, and lacks explicit validation checkpoints, which keeps two dimensions at 4 rather than 5.
Suggestions
Tighten actionability by including a minimal but complete HTML scaffold (doctype, the four columns, one sample card) inside the output contract so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit validation step to the workflow, e.g. 'Verify each column has 3-6 cards, every card has an assignee avatar, and the artifact parses before returning.'
Note that the top-bar filter row and sidebar 'Sprint pulse' are specified but not tied back to the design-system sections, so consider one line on how they map to required color/typography/layout/components.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, ~20-line body that assumes Claude's competence, with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line is a concrete instruction or contract. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete layout spec (top bar elements, four named columns, card fields, sidebar contents) and an output-contract artifact block, but the layout guidance is descriptive rather than fully executable code, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear four-step numbered sequence reads DESIGN.md → parse brief → layout → emit artifact, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints; this is not a destructive/batch operation so the cap does not apply, leaving only a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Workflow and Output contract sections with no bundle files present and no need for external references; for a skill under 50 lines with no external refs, clear organization earns the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |