Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and reasonably actionable with a clear workflow, but it lacks an explicit validation checkpoint for the generated output and references an unbundled DESIGN.md, which weakens workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to the workflow (e.g., "Verify contrast meets WCAG AA on all screens") so the output is checked before delivery.
Bundle or inline a concrete HTML skeleton/example so the output contract is fully executable rather than a placeholder.
Either bundle DESIGN.md or replace the "Read DESIGN.md" step with inline guidance so the workflow is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is task-relevant and earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete UI specifications (status bar contents, 3-dot pagination, full-width pill button, "Skip" top-right) but lacks an actual HTML code example for an HTML-generation skill, leaving a minor execution gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence exists, but there are no validation/verification checkpoints — the accessibility step is a goal rather than a verify step, and step 1 references an unbundled DESIGN.md. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized short skill with clear sections, but step 1 references a DESIGN.md that is not bundled, a minor dangling-reference gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |