Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured pipeline definition with an explicit convergence loop and typed input declarations; it scores especially well on workflow clarity and organization. Its only weaknesses are minor jargon-laden asides and the absence of guidance on how the atoms are executed beyond the declarative config.
Suggestions
Trim the spec-bookkeeping asides ('promoted into the spec §22.4 vocabulary by the `build-test` atom') that restate the `until` condition without adding operational guidance.
Add one line on how the `until` failure path behaves in practice (e.g. what to do when iterations>=8 is hit) to round out the feedback loop's error-recovery story.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no tutorial filler or concepts Claude already knows, but the 'promoted into the spec §22.4 vocabulary' sentence and 'cannot ship an `accept` decision' line partly restate the `until` condition already encoded in the config — minor over-explanation that could be trimmed, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The JSONC pipeline is concrete and copy-paste-ready within its plugin system (exact stage ids, atom names, `repeat`/`until` expressions) and inputs declare names, types, and required flags — mostly executable guidance, but there is no guidance on how any atom is actually invoked, keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The stage sequence (import → tokens → plan → verify → review → handoff) is explicit and the verify stage is a concrete validation feedback loop ('repeat': true with 'until': '(build.passing && tests.passing) || iterations>=8'), including an iteration bound for error recovery — matching the anchor requiring explicit validation steps and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines, no bundle files exist or are needed, and content is organized into two clear sections ('## Default pipeline', '## Required user inputs') with nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file — the rubric's simple-skill exception explicitly permits a 5 here. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |