Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable spec: an exact pipeline manifest, deterministic atom-selection rules, a concrete call contract, and a well-defined critique feedback loop. It stays lean and free of concepts Claude would already know, with only minor room to tighten the intro and add a failure-path note.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a compact manifest, a mapping list, call-shape bullets, and a two-step post-list — with only minor trimming candidates like the web-client/daemon lookup paragraph and 'The preview is what the user sees in the right pane.' | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: the exact stage manifest, kind-to-atom mapping rules, enumerated aspect values with default 16:9, the save path '<cwd>/media/<timestamp>.<ext>', and an explicit 'until' condition. Falls short of 5 only because the atom call shape is described without an actual invocation example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is explicit (discovery → plan → generate → critique with repeat/until), post-generation steps are numbered, and the critique loop is a real feedback loop with an explicit stop condition and how to apply critique notes. Minor gaps: no failure handling if the media atom errors and the five critique dimensions are referenced but not enumerated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file body is well-organized into clear, well-ordered sections with no nested or buried references. It sits slightly above the under-50-lines exception, and detail like the atom call shape could live in a separate reference file, so anchor 4 fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |