Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and concise with a clear multi-step workflow and an explicit parity-verification checkpoint, falling just short of top marks only because it lacks copy-paste code and a formal validate→fix→retry loop.
Suggestions
Add a short validate→fix→retry loop after the Verify Visual Parity step (e.g. 'If the canvas is blank or rendering diverges, return to step 3 and correct the visual model before re-verifying') to reach the workflow_clarity 5 anchor.
Include one minimal copy-paste-ready snippet (e.g. a Three.js full-screen shader skeleton or a WAAPI motion template) to lift actionability to 5.
Trim a few restating sentences like 'Prefer evidence over guesses' that restate prior guidance to nudge conciseness toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient and assumes Claude's competence (e.g. lists exactly what to intercept like 'gl.shaderSource()' without explaining what WebGL is), with only minor trimmable phrasing such as 'Prefer evidence over guesses. If an effect cannot be observed directly, mark it as an inference.' that slightly over-explains. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance throughout—named interception points ('gl.uniform*()', 'gl.bindFramebuffer()'), a decision matrix for which implementation to choose (DOM/CSS vs GSAP vs Three.js), and a defined deliverable; it stops short of copy-paste-ready code, which keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (Prepare → Runtime Inspection → Extract → Rebuild → Verify → Deliver) with an explicit verification checkpoint ('Verify Visual Parity') and fallback handling, but it lacks a strict validate→fix→retry feedback loop for the rebuild, leaving minor checkpoint gaps versus the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a focused overview; there are no bundle files, so content is appropriately self-contained in one level, with the only optional offload being the EXTRACTION-REPORT.md output—minor organization gaps versus the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |