Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured generative spec: concrete section-by-section guidance, an explicit output contract, and a self-check checklist. Its single notable gap is the absence of one worked snippet (e.g. a minimal plan-card or artifact skeleton), which keeps actionability at 4.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, imperative, and free of basic-concept padding — e.g. "Use `<details><summary>` for the collapse — no JS" and "Mark the recommended tier with the DS accent border or a small badge". Every line is spec, so it matches the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance — tier counts with naming examples, "4–6 bullet features", "CSS Grid" for both the card row and table, "`data-od-id` on each tier card", and an exact `<artifact>` output template. It stops short of a worked HTML example, so it fits 'mostly executable; minor gaps' rather than fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Workflow section gives a clear Read → Classify → Sections → Write → Money-rendering → Self-check sequence, and step 6 is an explicit validation checklist ("Prices are plausible", "renders cleanly at 1024px", "No fake feature names"). No destructive or batch operation applies, so no cap is triggered. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is roughly 50 lines with two well-organized sections (Workflow, Output contract), no bundle files, and no content that belongs in a separate file — this meets the rubric's simple-skill exception where well-organized sections alone score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |