Content
47%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well organized as a catalogue stub, but it provides almost no executable guidance: the sole command opens a browser, and the essential 'install the upstream bundle' step has no actual instruction. As a result actionability and workflow clarity sit well below the midpoint.
Suggestions
Replace the browser-open with an executable step, e.g. `npx create-video@latest` or a concrete git-clone/copy command for installing the upstream bundle into the skills directory.
Define the install workflow explicitly (1. fetch upstream, 2. copy into <skills-dir>/remotion, 3. verify the skill is discoverable) instead of deferring everything to "inspect the upstream README".
If local reference/script files are meant to exist, include them in the bundle rather than advertising "original assets, scripts, and references" that are not present.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short (~30 lines) with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section is brief. Minor waste keeps it below the 'every token earns its place' anchor: the description text and the upstream URL/category from the frontmatter are duplicated in 'What it does' and 'Source'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The only concrete command is `open https://github.com/remotion-dev/remotion`, which merely opens a browser and accomplishes none of the described task; "install the upstream bundle into your active agent's skills directory" has no actual command. This matches 'minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute' rather than anchor 3, which requires some usable (even if incomplete) concrete guidance. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is present (inspect README → install bundle → invoke by name/triggers), but the critical step (installing the bundle) is undefined and no checkpoints exist. This matches 'rough sequence present but many gaps; steps poorly defined'; the skill is not destructive/batch, so no validation cap applies. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections (What it does, Source, How to use) are well organized, the body is under 50 lines, and there are no nested references or inline reference dumps. It falls below the anchor-5 clean split because the skill's actual payload (upstream assets, scripts, and references) is entirely deferred to an external URL with no local files, leaving the pointer structure somewhat hollow. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |