Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a thin catalogue entry rather than a working skill: it is well-organized and points cleanly upstream, but provides no executable guidance for actually building components and punts the core install step to an external README.
Suggestions
Provide the concrete install command for the upstream bundle (e.g., the exact git clone / copy paths) instead of instructing the reader to 'inspect the upstream README for exact paths'.
Replace the meta-framing about Open Design discovery with a minimal, actionable quick-start step.
Add a brief validation step confirming the skill is installed and invokable before relying on it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and mostly lean, but spends tokens on meta-framing ('This catalogue entry advertises the skill in Open Design so the agent discovers it during planning') rather than skill substance, so it does not meet the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It offers a concrete command (`open https://github.com/google-labs-code/skills`) and names skill invocation, but the core instruction to 'install the upstream bundle into your active agent's skills directory' provides no install command or paths, leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A loose sequence is present (install bundle -> inspect README -> invoke by name/trigger), but the single action is not unambiguous — 'install the upstream bundle' is unspecified — and there are no validation checkpoints, so it cannot reach 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no local bundle files, the body is well-organized into clear sections (What it does, Source, How to use) and points one level out to a clearly signaled upstream link, satisfying the simple-skill progressive disclosure guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |