Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable template skill with a clear validated workflow and well-organized references. The only gap is a referenced example.html that is missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Either add the referenced example.html to the bundle or remove it from the resource map, frontmatter secondary outputs, and the checklist P0 line to eliminate the broken reference.
Confirm the resource map tree matches the actual layout (example.html is shown at the root but is absent; assets/template.html is the only HTML present).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what charts or glassmorphism are — and every section (resource map, workflow, data contract, output contract) earns its tokens with actionable detail. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready: exact adaptation steps ("Read active DESIGN.md first, map tokens to CSS variables, then adapt assets/template.html"), per-chart unit/decimal contracts, the 3-element stack array invariant, and an explicit <artifact> wrapper example to emit. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 6-step sequence culminating in an explicit validation checkpoint ("Validate with references/checklist.md before emitting the artifact"), with the checklist acting as a feedback loop — appropriate for an artifact-generation skill and not a destructive/batch context that would cap the score. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good — a resource map plus one-level-deep references to assets/template.html and references/checklist.md (both real files) — but the resource map and the checklist P0 reference an example.html that does not exist in the bundle, a broken referenced path that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |