Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured, highly concrete single-file card spec that earns its tokens and is easy to navigate; its only gaps are the absence of a copy-paste HTML example and an explicit output-verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, dense design spec with exact values (colors, sizes, fonts, number formats) and no padded explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries a constraint. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance with exact hex colors, dimensions, fonts, and inline-SVG icon specs, but it is a constraints spec rather than a copy-paste ready HTML code block, which keeps it just short of fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single-purpose card build is unambiguously sequenced (frame → vote rail → main body → icons), but there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint for the rendered output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained spec under 50 lines with clear sections (画布/卡片结构/字体/设计细节) and no bundle files or nested references, matching the rubric's under-50-lines exception for scoring 5 on well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |