Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction body with real bundle files behind every reference and a genuine validation step. The residual gaps are the unspecified CSS-variable contract, no failure/retry loop around the checklist, and the orphaned example.html entry.
Suggestions
In step 1, name the concrete CSS variables from assets/template.html (e.g., --paper, --ink, --accent-a through --accent-d) or show a one-line mapping example so the palette/type decisions have an explicit target.
Add a feedback loop to step 6: 'If any P0 checklist item fails, fix the template and re-validate before emitting' to close the validate -> fix -> retry cycle.
Either reference example.html in the workflow (e.g., 'See example.html for a completed sample') or remove it from the resource map so every listed file has a stated purpose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean with zero padding: an intro sentence, a resource map, a 6-step workflow, and an output contract. It assumes Claude's competence throughout (e.g., 'Keep output self-contained (`<!doctype html>`, inline CSS/JS, no external runtime dependency)') and explains nothing Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: 'Copy `assets/template.html` to `index.html`', concrete interaction list, and a copy-paste-ready `<artifact>` block. It falls short of anchor 5 because 'map palette/type/layout decisions into root CSS variables' gives no concrete variable names or mapping example — the model must discover the template's variable contract on its own. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Validate against `references/checklist.md` before emitting') that was verified to exist in the bundle. Not anchor 5: there is no feedback loop — nothing tells Claude what to do when a checklist item fails, only that validation must happen before emitting. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure against the actual bundle: the resource map matches the real files (`assets/template.html` and `references/checklist.md` both exist and are referenced from the workflow), and references are one level deep. Minor gaps keep it below 5: `example.html` is listed in the resource map but never used or explained in the workflow, and the checklist is only pointed to at the end rather than summarized for discovery. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |