Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured template skill with executable steps and an explicit validation checklist; its main gap is that the validation feedback loop and the CSS-variable mapping are implied rather than spelled out.
Suggestions
Make the validate->fix->retry loop explicit, e.g. 'If checklist fails, fix the issue and re-validate before emitting.'
Add a brief root-CSS variable schema (or point to it in template.html) so the DESIGN.md mapping step is concrete instead of implied.
Reference example.html in the body workflow (it appears in the resource map and checklist but not the steps) so its role is clear.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a short workflow, a resource map, and an output contract with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance (copy assets/template.html to index.html, keep specified structures and interactions, inline CSS/JS, emit an <artifact> block) with minor gaps: it tells Claude to map DESIGN.md to CSS variables without showing the variable schema, and the artifact example is a placeholder. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with a validation checkpoint ('Validate against references/checklist.md before emitting') and an explicit P0 checklist, but the validate->fix->retry loop is only implicit rather than a stated feedback loop, so it sits just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good one-level-deep structure: a resource map lists real bundle files (assets/template.html, references/checklist.md) and references are clearly signaled, though example.html is referenced in the map and checklist but not in the body workflow, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |