Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured single-purpose skill with concrete layout guidance and a clear output contract. Its main weakness is a broken reference to DESIGN.md, which the workflow depends on but which is absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Either provide DESIGN.md in ./references/ or remove the 'Read DESIGN.md' step and inline any required design tokens (palette, accent, spacing) directly in the body.
Add a minimal HTML skeleton or one complete objective-card example so the output contract is copy-paste ready rather than structural-only.
Clarify the output contract by showing the expected progress-bar markup pattern for a key result, not just the artifact wrapper.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~22-line body that assumes Claude's competence, with no over-explanation of known concepts and every line (layout spec, output contract) earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete structural guidance — exact card structure, status pill values ('On track / At risk / Off track'), key-result row fields, and an artifact output contract — but no executable HTML example, leaving minor gaps for a code-producing skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence for a single-purpose prototype skill that needs no validation checkpoints, slightly capped by step 1's reference to a DESIGN.md that is not provided. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized (Workflow, Output contract) for a short skill, but the workflow's opening 'Read DESIGN.md' references a file that does not exist in any bundle directory, a broken one-level reference that hinders navigation and execution. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |