Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, actionable, and well-structured with a real reference file and an explicit validation step. It sits just below the top anchors because the validation loop is implied rather than spelled out and example.html is referenced but missing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids re-explaining HTML/CSS concepts; the only minor slack is the resource-map ASCII tree plus the slightly ceremonial Output contract prose. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable steps are given (copy assets/template.html to index.html, personalize labels, preserve specific interactions) and a verbatim artifact contract is supplied, though no inline code snippet demonstrates the personalization step. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence ends with validation against references/checklist.md, but the validation is named rather than shown as an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with a resource map and one-level-deep reference to checklist.md that resolves to a real file; the referenced example.html is listed but not present in the bundle, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |