Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured template skill: lean body, concrete workflow, an explicit validation checkpoint, and a tiered checklist reference. The main weaknesses are a phantom `example.html` entry in the resource map and the absence of an error-recovery loop around the validation step.
Suggestions
Remove `example.html` from the resource map (or actually ship it) — the file does not exist in the bundle, so the map currently points readers at a missing resource.
Add a failure path to the workflow after step 7: e.g., 'If any P0 checklist item fails, fix it and re-validate before emitting the artifact' — this closes the validate->fix->retry loop.
Clarify step 1's 'Read active `DESIGN.md`': state where this file comes from (user-provided? workspace file?) or what to do in its absence, since the bundle does not include it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean and imperative with zero padding — no concept explanations, no justification prose. Every section (resource map, 7-step workflow, output contract) earns its tokens, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps are executable and specific ('Copy `assets/template.html` to `index.html`', 'map typography/color/layout into CSS variables', keyboard command palette `/`), and the output contract includes a copy-paste artifact wrapper. It misses 5 because some details are implicit: where index.html should be written, how to run the checklist, and what to do when a checklist item fails are left unstated. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1-7 sequence ends with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Validate against `references/checklist.md` before emitting'), and the checklist itself is tiered P0/P1/P2. It misses 5 because there is no error-recovery loop — the workflow does not say what to do when validation fails, and 'Read active `DESIGN.md`' (step 1) references a file whose provenance is not explained. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The structure is good: an explicit resource map, one-level-deep references to `assets/template.html` and `references/checklist.md` (both verified to exist), and well-organized sections. It is not 5 because the resource map lists `example.html` at the bundle root, which does not exist — a broken navigation pointer that undermines the map's reliability. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |