Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and points cleanly to real bundle files with a validation step. It would reach top marks by adding an explicit fix-and-retry loop and a concrete personalization example.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after step 7: 'If checklist fails, fix and re-validate before emitting.'
Include a short concrete example for personalization (e.g., one instrument rename or a KPI label swap) so the copy-and-personalize step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~40 lines), assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; the opening directive and step list are token-efficient with every line earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete, executable commands ('Copy `assets/template.html` to `index.html`', 'Validate against `references/checklist.md`') and an explicit artifact wrapper, but the personalization step ('Personalize headings, instrument names, and numeric labels') stays high-level without an inline example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence is present with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 7) and an external checklist, but the validate->fix->retry feedback loop is implied rather than stated, keeping it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a resource map and well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real bundle files (`assets/template.html`, `references/checklist.md`), both of which exist, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |