Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-organized body that gives a clear four-step workflow with sensible constraints (self-contained, no network assets). The main gaps are the absence of any executable render command and the dangling `source/` reference, plus a verbatim duplicate of the frontmatter description as the opening line.
Suggestions
Replace 'Render to MP4 via the html-video / HyperFrames renderer' with the actual renderer invocation or script path so the final step is executable rather than descriptive.
Drop the opening tagline that repeats the frontmatter description verbatim, or replace it with non-duplicative guidance (e.g. the render settings or customization constraints).
Verify the `source/` bundle ships alongside SKILL.md — the body's only reference (`source/index.html`) currently points at a file that is not in the bundle — or list the expected bundle contents so the reference is checkable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — no concept explanations, no padding, tight sections. Not a 5 because the opening line 'Electric split with hand-drawn script — offset panels slide in...' duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim, so that token spend earns nothing new. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps reference a concrete file ('Read `source/index.html`') and give concrete edit direction ('Replace the sample copy (headlines, figures, labels)'), but the terminal render step has no command ('Render to MP4 via the html-video / HyperFrames renderer' names no executable action), and the referenced `source/` bundle is not present in this skill tree, so key execution details are missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly numbered, unambiguous steps in correct order (understand → replace copy → keep self-contained → render). Not a 5 because there is no checkpoint of any kind (e.g. a quick render-preview or visual verification before final output), though the operation is non-destructive so the omission is a minor gap rather than a disqualifier. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~20-line) body with well-organized sections ('What this template is', 'Workflow', 'Attribution') and a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to the `source/` bundle. Not a 5 because the referenced path `source/index.html` does not exist in the provided bundle, so the disclosure structure cannot fully resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |