Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, high-density design rulebook: exact values, a banned list, required components, and a validation checklist with essentially zero wasted tokens. Its main defects are the missing promised example.html template (a broken reference and the absence of a complete worked example) and the lack of an explicit build order beyond section ordering.
Suggestions
Add the referenced `example.html` to the bundle (or inline a compact HTML skeleton) so the "fully-realized template" pointer resolves.
Add a brief ordered workflow before "Hard rules" (e.g., 1. read rules/bans, 2. scaffold from example.html, 3. assemble required components, 4. run pre-flight) to give the checklist a forward sequence.
Split the long font-stack and pastel-chip value lists into a small reference file if the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as the overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a rule with a concrete value ("#FBFBFA", "letter-spacing: -0.025em", "py-24", "cubic-bezier(0.16, 1, 0.3, 1)") — no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, no padding, no filler. The one-line Source attribution is the only non-instructional text and earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is unusually concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact hex values, named font stacks, pixel values, Tailwind classes, timings, and easing curves, plus a "Banned" list and required component inventory. Not a 5 because the promised fully-realized template ("See `example.html` in this directory") does not exist in the bundle, leaving no complete worked example to execute from. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action (produce an editorial-minimalist page) is unambiguous, and the "Pre-flight" checklist provides explicit post-hoc validation (seven checkboxes covering pairing, colors, borders, asymmetry, padding, banned items). Not a 5 because there is no forward sequence telling Claude how to proceed — e.g., start from the template, then apply hard rules, then check pre-flight — and the missing example.html removes the natural starting step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-labeled and scannable, but the only external reference — "See `example.html` in this directory for a fully-realized template" — is a dangling pointer: no example.html and no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist in the bundle. Per the rubric, progressive disclosure is scored against the actual bundle structure, so a clearly-signaled reference to a nonexistent file caps this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |