Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent, token-efficient design spec with highly actionable concrete values and a verification checklist. Its main weakness is a broken reference to a non-existent example.html and the absence of an explicit ordered build workflow.
Suggestions
Either ship the referenced example.html template or remove the 'See example.html' reference so progressive disclosure is not broken.
Add a short ordered build sequence (scaffold -> components -> motion -> pre-flight) with a validate/fix/retry loop for the pre-flight checks.
Move the natural trigger terms out of the intro paragraph and into a labeled 'Use when' section for discoverability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean — exact values, Tailwind classes, and concise lists with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact radii ('border-radius: 28px-40px'), shadow values ('0 20px 40px -15px rgba(0,0,0,0.05)'), cubic-bezier curves, and a runnable pre-flight checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A pre-flight checklist supplies a verification step, but the body is organized as topical rules rather than an ordered build sequence, and there is no validate->fix->retry feedback loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the single external reference ('See example.html in this directory') is clearly signaled one level deep, but that file does not exist in the bundle, so the disclosure promise is unfulfilled. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |