Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction set for a single-purpose wireframing skill: concrete palette and component specs, a numbered workflow with a self-check, and a precise output contract. It loses only slightly on actionability and workflow_clarity for lacking an explicit code stub and a formal validate->retry loop.
Suggestions
Add a minimal inline HTML/CSS stub (e.g. a skeleton with the pale page, one grey block, and one X-crossed image placeholder) to lift actionability from concrete guidance to copy-paste-ready.
Reframe the 'Self-check' step as an explicit validate->fix->retry loop (list the specific failure conditions to check, then state 're-render until it passes') for stronger workflow_clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — gives palette hex codes, a specific ordered component list, and an output contract without explaining HTML/CSS basics Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance (exact hex palette, named components, output contract with artifact tag), but provides no inline executable code stub — acceptable for an instruction-only skill, leaving minor gaps versus copy-paste-ready examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered 5-step sequence with a 'Self-check' validation step describing what to verify, but the feedback loop is described qualitatively ('fix it') rather than as an explicit validate->fix->retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed — well-organized into Workflow / Output contract sections; per the simple-skill scoring note this merits full marks with no bundle files required. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |