CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

spek-implement

Implement an approved Spec by executing its Plan.

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/spek-implement/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exemplary instruction-only skill: fully executable commands, explicit sequencing with validation and error-recovery feedback loops, and disciplined imperative prose. Its only weaknesses are a triple-stated behavioral warning that could be consolidated and a length that suggests extracting a few situational sections into reference files.

Suggestions

Consolidate the three repetitions of the "a single CLI call is not completion / do not stop after implement new" warning into one prominently placed statement.

Move the orchestrator-mode section ("When an orchestrator starts this skill") into a separate reference file (e.g. references/orchestrated.md) and keep a one-line pointer plus the changed-command summary in SKILL.md.

Consider moving the detailed dependency-override and uncommitted-changes dialog trees into a reference file to shorten the main workflow body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean, imperative, and assumes Claude's competence — no basic concepts are explained — but the "do not stop after implement new" warning is repeated three times (opening blockquote, "This is a loop. Do not stop after the first step", "Concretely: do not stop after `implement new`"), which is trimmable redundancy.

4 / 5

Actionability

Every instruction is copy-paste executable: exact commands with full JSON payloads (e.g. `spektacular implement new --data '{"name": "<spec_name>", "override_dependencies": true}'`), concrete refusal codes (`dependencies_unmet`, `task_not_found`, `auto_commit_failed`, `worktree_unavailable`) each paired with its exact remediation command and user-handling script.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The core loop (read `instruction` → perform step → `goto` → repeat until finished) is explicitly sequenced with feedback at every step via the CLI's state machine, plus detailed validation/checkpoint handling for interruptions, resume reports, uncommitted changes, merge conflicts, and the user-approved spec amendment loop with error recovery paths.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and the single self-contained body is well organized under clear headers (# Worktrees, # When the spec or a design is wrong, # When an orchestrator starts this skill). It is a ~175-line body, however, and sections such as the orchestrator-mode and dependency-override details are reasonable candidates for extraction into reference files, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and accurately states what the skill does, but it is bare-minimum: it lacks any "when to use" trigger guidance, natural synonyms, or a listing of concrete capabilities. It reads as a title rather than a triggerable description.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when the user asks to implement, build, or execute an approved Spec or its Plan with the spektacular CLI".

Enumerate the concrete actions the skill performs, such as driving the implement workflow step-by-step via `spektacular implement goto`, running tasks and tests, updating the changelog, and merging worktrees.

Include natural synonyms and ecosystem terms users would actually say ("spektacular", "implement the spec", "execute the plan", "build the feature") to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Implement an approved Spec by executing its Plan" names the domain (an approved Spec, its Plan) and a concrete action, but the action is near-circular ("implement... by executing") and no sub-actions are listed, matching the anchor for domain plus 1-2 concrete actions without comprehensive coverage.

3 / 5

Completeness

The description clearly answers "what" (implements an approved Spec by executing its Plan) but contains no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The terms "Spec", "Plan", and "Implement" are relevant keywords, but common natural variations users would say (e.g. "spektacular", "build the feature", "execute the plan") are missing, matching the anchor for some relevant keywords without synonyms.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Spec" and "Plan" are semi-generic terms; the skill is somewhat specific within its ecosystem but the description alone could overlap with sibling spec/plan-oriented skills, matching the anchor for some specificity with residual overlap risk.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

nicholasjackson/tcgreplay

Path

skills/spek-implement/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.