CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

observability

Instrument services with structured logging, Prometheus metrics, and OpenTelemetry tracing. Build Grafana dashboards, write Prometheus alerting rules, run k6 load tests, and plan infrastructure capacity.

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/platform-skills/skills/observability/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is observability in nitinjain999/platform-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Set up or improve observability for a service or platform component.


Interactive Wizard (fires when no arguments are provided)

When invoked with no arguments, ask before proceeding:

Q1 — Mode?

What do you need?
  1. instrument — add structured logs, Prometheus metrics, and OTel tracing to a service
  2. dashboard  — create a Grafana RED/USE dashboard for a service
  3. alert      — write Prometheus alerting rules for a service
  4. slo        — define SLIs, error budgets, and SLO burn-rate alerts
  5. loadtest   — write and run a k6 load test
  6. capacity   — estimate resource requirements and HPA configuration

Enter 1–6 or mode name:

Q2 — Context (after mode selected):

  • instrument: What language/framework and which metrics/tracing backend (Prometheus, Datadog, Jaeger, Tempo)?
  • dashboard: Service name and which signal to lead with — request-based (RED) or resource-based (USE)?
  • alert: Service name and what SLIs matter most — error rate, latency, availability?
  • slo: Service name, expected availability target (e.g. 99.9%), and current p95 latency baseline:
  • loadtest: Target endpoint, expected peak RPS, and SLO thresholds (p95 latency, max error rate):
  • capacity: Expected peak RPS, measured p99 latency at current load, and memory per pod:

Mode: instrument

Add the three pillars — logs, metrics, traces — to a service.

Steps:

  1. Ask for: language/framework, existing logging library (if any), metrics backend (Prometheus / Datadog / CloudWatch), tracing backend (Jaeger / Tempo / OTLP)
  2. Add structured JSON logging with correlation IDs (Pino for Node.js, structlog for Python)
  3. Instrument RED metrics: http_requests_total counter, http_request_duration_seconds histogram, per route and status
  4. Add OpenTelemetry tracing with span attributes on critical paths
  5. Expose /metrics scrape endpoint (Prometheus) or configure push exporter
  6. Add /healthz and /readyz health check endpoints
  7. Document what NOT to log (passwords, tokens, PII)

Reference: references/observability.md → Structured Logging, Prometheus Metrics, OpenTelemetry Tracing

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability alert to write alerting rules for the metrics just added, then /platform-skills:observability slo to wrap them in an error budget.

Mode: dashboard

Create a Grafana dashboard for a service.

Steps:

  1. Choose method: RED (request-based services) or USE (resource-based infrastructure)
  2. Define panels: request rate, error rate %, p50/p95/p99 latency, active connections, queue depth
  3. Set meaningful Y-axis units (req/s, ms, %)
  4. Add threshold lines at SLO boundaries
  5. Configure template variables for environment and service filtering

Reference: references/observability.md → Grafana Dashboards

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability slo to add SLO burn-rate alerts and an error budget panel to this dashboard.

Mode: alert

Write Prometheus alerting rules for a service.

Steps:

  1. Identify SLIs: error rate, latency percentiles, availability
  2. Write alert expressions using rate() over 5m windows
  3. Set for: duration ≥ 1m to suppress transient noise
  4. Add severity label (critical / warning) and runbook annotation to every alert
  5. Validate: no alert fires on healthy baseline, alert fires on injected fault

Alert design rules:

  • Page on symptoms (error rate, latency), not causes (CPU %)
  • Every alert needs a runbook URL
  • Derive SLO burn-rate alerts from error budget, not raw thresholds

Reference: references/observability.md → Alerting Rules

Security posture and CVE alerts from Kubescape's exporter (kubescape_controls_total_*, kubescape_vulnerabilities_*; failing scans show only in the scanner's logs, not in these metrics) → /platform-skills:kubescape-operator metrics.

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability slo to promote these symptom alerts to proper SLO burn-rate alerts backed by an error budget.

Mode: loadtest

Write and run a k6 load test.

Steps:

  1. Ask for: target endpoint, expected peak RPS, SLO thresholds (p95 latency, error rate)
  2. Write ramp-up → steady-state → ramp-down stages
  3. Set thresholds matching the SLO
  4. Add check() assertions on status code and response time

Version check: k6 --version — must be ≥ 1.0.0. k6 v0.x and v1.x have incompatible JavaScript API syntax. Upgrade: brew install k6 (macOS) or see https://grafana.com/docs/k6/latest/set-up/install-k6/ for other platforms.

  1. Run: k6 run --out json=results.json load-test.js
  2. Interpret results: p95/p99 latency, error rate, throughput achieved vs. thresholds

Reference: references/observability.md → Load Testing

Mode: capacity

Estimate resource requirements and HPA configuration for a service.

Steps:

  1. Gather: expected peak RPS, measured p99 latency, memory per pod at current load
  2. Apply formula: replicas = ceil((peak_rps × avg_latency_s) / target_concurrency_per_pod)
  3. Add 50% headroom for spikes
  4. Generate HPA manifest with CPU utilisation target ≤ 60%
  5. Set resource requests to measured baseline + 20%; set memory limit; omit CPU limit unless throttling is acceptable
  6. Define min/max replica bounds

Reference: references/observability.md → Capacity Planning

→ Next: After sizing, run /platform-skills:observability loadtest to validate the HPA triggers correctly under synthetic load.


Mode: slo

Define SLIs, set error budgets, and generate SLO burn-rate alerts from first principles.

Steps:

  1. Define SLIs — identify what "good" looks like for this service:

    • Availability: sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
    • Latency: histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) < 0.3
    • Choose one primary SLI per service; add a secondary only if the first doesn't capture the user journey
  2. Set the SLO target — start conservative, tighten over time:

    SLO:           99.9% availability over a 30-day rolling window
    Error budget:  0.1% = 43.2 minutes per 30 days
  3. Generate burn-rate alerts — multiwindow, multi-burn-rate (Google SRE Book approach):

    # Fast burn — consumes 5% of monthly budget in 1h → page immediately
    - alert: SLOFastBurn
      expr: |
        (
          rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h])
          / rate(http_requests_total[1h])
        ) > (14.4 * 0.001)   # 14.4× burn rate exhausts budget in ~2 days
      for: 2m
      labels:
        severity: critical
      annotations:
        summary: "Fast error budget burn on {{ $labels.service }}"
        runbook: "https://runbooks.internal/slo-fast-burn"
    
    # Slow burn — consumes 10% of monthly budget in 6h → ticket
    - alert: SLOSlowBurn
      expr: |
        (
          rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[6h])
          / rate(http_requests_total[6h])
        ) > (6 * 0.001)      # 6× burn rate exhausts budget in ~5 days
      for: 15m
      labels:
        severity: warning
      annotations:
        summary: "Slow error budget burn on {{ $labels.service }}"
        runbook: "https://runbooks.internal/slo-slow-burn"
  4. Track remaining error budget — add to the Grafana dashboard:

    # Error budget remaining (%) over 30d
    1 - (
      sum(increase(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[30d]))
      / sum(increase(http_requests_total[30d]))
    ) / 0.001   # divide by error budget fraction (1 - SLO target)
  5. Error budget policy — state in writing what happens when the budget is depleted:

    • 50% remaining → normal feature velocity

    • 10–50% remaining → reliability improvements prioritised alongside features
    • <10% remaining → feature freeze; only reliability work until budget recovers

Key rules:

  • Alert on burn rate, not on raw error count — burn rate is predictive
  • The for: on fast burn should be short (1–2m); slow burn needs longer (10–15m)
  • Latency SLOs need histogram buckets aligned to the SLO threshold at chart creation time — you cannot retroactively add buckets

→ Next: Run /platform-skills:observability alert to add symptom-based alerts alongside SLO burn-rate alerts.


Common mistakes

  • Alerting on CPU% or memory% — these are causes, not symptoms. Alert on error rate and latency; let CPU/memory be dashboard panels only
  • Missing for: duration — without it, a single bad scrape triggers a page. Minimum 1m for slow alerts, 2m for fast SLO burn
  • Not defining SLOs before writing alerts — without an SLO, you don't know what threshold to alert at. Define the SLO first (slo mode), then write alerts
  • Histogram bucket boundaries misaligned with SLO — if your SLO is p95 < 300ms and you have no bucket at 0.3s, histogram_quantile interpolates inaccurately. Set le values at 0.1, 0.25, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5
  • Labelling with high-cardinality dimensions — never use user_id, session_id, or request_id as Prometheus label values. Cardinality explodes memory usage
  • Alert fatigue from symptom + cause alerts — if you alert on both "error rate high" and "database connection pool exhausted", both fire simultaneously for the same incident. Alert on the symptom; include cause investigation in the runbook
Repository

nitinjain999/platform-skills

Path

plugins/platform-skills/skills/observability/SKILL.md

Last updated
First committed

Canonical home

nitinjain999/platform-skills
In sync

since Oct 12, 2026

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.