Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction skill with a clear structural sequence; its only real gap is the absence of worked examples that would make the principles concretely actionable.
Suggestions
Add one or two worked before/after examples (e.g. a single-promise hook vs. a five-claim version it replaces, or a sample ad structure walking tension -> payoff -> brand recall) so the rules become concrete and copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean set of short bullets with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is directive guidance, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The rules are clear and directive ('Every shot should either build desire, reduce doubt, or prove the promise'; 'Frame the product as the hero when the brief is product-led'), but they stay at the level of principles with no worked examples or specific instantiations, which the score-3 anchor's 'specific examples' requires. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines, the Structure Rules give a clear linear sequence (hook -> high-value context -> tension-to-payoff -> brand recall -> clean takeaway), so the simple-skills allowance applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed, the body is well-organized into clear sections (Messaging, Structure, Visual, Avoid), meeting the simple-skills allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |