Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable set of lighting-continuity heuristics well-organized into focused sections with no padding. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit verification step for confirming continuity across shots.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet-point guidance with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (ratio heuristics, rules, prompting, failures) earns its tokens; not level 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill: specific ratio bands (1:1–2:1, 4:1, 8:1+) with moods, a concrete attribute list to track (key direction, fill, rim, practical motivation), and explicit prompting directives and failure patterns to block; not level 2 because the directives are specific and copy-ready rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The heuristics, rules, prompting, and failure lists imply an apply-then-check flow, but there is no explicit sequence or verification checkpoint for confirming continuity holds across shots; not level 3 because no validation/feedback loop is stated, and not level 1 because the guidance is organized and sequenced implicitly. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed ("StudioBinder lighting ratio guide" is a citation, not a bundle path) and well-organized into clear sections; per the simple-skills note this scores 3 with well-organized sections and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |