Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, dense, highly actionable skill body with an excellent decision table and an unusually precise behavior contract. Its main defect is that the referenced templates file (reference.md) is missing from the bundle, which undermines both the actionability of the checklist and the skill's only progressive-disclosure path, and the verify section lacks error-recovery guidance.
Suggestions
Create the missing reference file (e.g. references/reference.md) containing the full component templates the body links to, or remove/replace the dangling "Full templates: see reference.md" link — currently the promised templates are unreachable.
Add an error-recovery feedback loop to the Build & verify section (e.g. what to check and fix when `pnpm build`, type-check, or the manual connect/disconnect test fails) to close the gap between the checklist and validation.
Inline one small copy-paste-ready skeleton (the base props interface plus the Renderer.tsx registry entry) so the core steps remain executable even without the external templates file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries dense repo-specific information with zero padding: the connection-model decision table, exact polling constants ("2500ms, 120_000ms timeout"), and gotchas like "The core is SolidJS, not React: signals over hooks" (a repo-specific framing, not a general tutorial). Nothing explains concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly executable — exact file paths ("packages/js/src/ui/components/Renderer.tsx"), exact SDK calls ("generateConnectOAuthUrl()", "link({ integrationIdentifier })"), named copy-sources, and concrete verify commands ("pnpm build"). However, "Full templates: see [reference.md](reference.md)" points to a file that does not exist in the bundle, so the promised copy-paste-ready templates are unreachable — a concrete gap that keeps this between anchors 4 and 5, noticeably below anchor 5's "copy-paste ready" bar. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is explicit and well-ordered: "Step 0 — Pick the connection model (do this first)" drives all later choices, followed by a checkbox file checklist and a Build & verify section with real validation (pnpm build, type-check + lint, manual playground test). What's missing is any error-recovery feedback loop (e.g. what to do when the build or type-check fails), which distinguishes anchor 4 from anchor 5's "feedback loops for error recovery". | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scored against the actual bundle structure as the rubric instructs: the body is well-sectioned and appropriately keeps the decision table and behavior contract inline, but its single external reference — "Full templates: see [reference.md](reference.md)" — resolves to a nonexistent file (no references/ directory exists in the bundle). The one disclosure path the skill advertises is broken, which is a worse defect than anchor 4's "minor organization gaps", landing this between anchors 3 and 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |