Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable, well-sequenced body that respects the token budget and includes real validation checkpoints. The one clear gap is progressive disclosure: it points to a reference.md for full templates that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced reference.md (with the Telegram/Slack/MS Teams full templates) or drop the link and inline the template excerpts that are actually needed.
If reference.md is intended to live elsewhere, use a clearly-signaled path so the reference resolves.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives contracts, paths, and conventions without explaining what a dashboard or a feature flag is, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact file paths, the build<Channel>WhatsNextConfig contract, flag names, and a Create/Edit/Optional checklist with copy-and-go detail. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs from prerequisites (Step 0) through a file checklist to a Build & verify section with explicit validation checkpoints ('Do not build', check types via Cursor diagnostics, confirm the flag hides). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but the body signals 'Full templates: see reference.md' and no reference.md (or references/ directory) exists, so the one-level-deep reference it relies on is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |