CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

add-channel-whats-next-onboarding

Add a new chat channel's layer-2 dashboard onboarding — the connected-state "What's next" / "FOR YOUR USERS" developer-rollout guide plus its connected details page — in apps/dashboard, following the existing Slack, MS Teams, and Telegram pattern. Use when a connected agent integration needs a per-provider "what's next" guide (recap + dev steps with @novu/react ConnectButton snippet), a <Channel>AgentConnectedDetails view, and the resolver/registry wiring under components/agents/agent-integration-guides.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, actionable, well-sequenced body that respects the token budget and includes real validation checkpoints. The one clear gap is progressive disclosure: it points to a reference.md for full templates that is not present in the bundle.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced reference.md (with the Telegram/Slack/MS Teams full templates) or drop the link and inline the template excerpts that are actually needed.

If reference.md is intended to live elsewhere, use a clearly-signaled path so the reference resolves.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives contracts, paths, and conventions without explaining what a dashboard or a feature flag is, so every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: exact file paths, the build<Channel>WhatsNextConfig contract, flag names, and a Create/Edit/Optional checklist with copy-and-go detail.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence runs from prerequisites (Step 0) through a file checklist to a Build & verify section with explicit validation checkpoints ('Do not build', check types via Cursor diagnostics, confirm the flag hides).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the body signals 'Full templates: see reference.md' and no reference.md (or references/ directory) exists, so the one-level-deep reference it relies on is broken.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, well-triggered description that cleanly separates what from when and stakes out a distinct niche. Its main weakness is trigger-term quality: the language leans technical and would benefit from more natural user-facing phrasings.

Suggestions

Soften trigger terms toward what a user would naturally say (e.g. 'add the post-connection what's-next guide for a chat channel') to broaden coverage beyond internal jargon.

Consider folding the 'FOR YOUR USERS' label out of the description; it is UI copy, not a trigger phrase.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'layer-2 dashboard onboarding', 'developer-rollout guide', 'connected details page', and 'resolver/registry wiring' — rather than abstract language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (add the onboarding guide + connected details page) and when (explicit 'Use when' trigger with the conditions), satisfying the dual what/when requirement.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Has an explicit 'Use when a connected agent integration needs a per-provider what's next guide' clause, but the terms are jargon-heavy ('layer-2 dashboard onboarding', 'FOR YOUR USERS') and miss common user-facing phrasings.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — the connected-state layer-2 onboarding at a specific path — and explicitly distinguishes itself from the layer-1 setup guide, so it is unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
novuhq/novu
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.