Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured design guide: dense tables, concrete defaults, clear decision branches, and clean progressive disclosure into five real reference files. The only soft spot is actionability where framework code is deferred rather than shown inline.
Suggestions
Add a one-line executable `skip: () => …` Framework example next to the JSON-Logic snippet so both surfaces have copy-paste condition code in-body.
Consider a short 'Design checklist' recap (channels ≤3, severity unset by default, critical skips digest, push only when offline) to make the workflow's terminal verification step explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, table-driven guidance that assumes Claude's competence — no padding about what notifications or digests are, and every section (priority order, defaults, pitfalls) earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-ready defaults (digest type "regular", 5-min look-back, 1-hour digest, key subscriberId, channel priority In-App > Email > Chat > Push > SMS, cap 3) plus a JSON-Logic snippet; minor gap is the framework `skip` callback being named but not shown and full code deferred to other skills. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Decision flow is clearly branched ("If the user specified channels" vs "did NOT specify") with a 9-row template table and an 8-item Common Pitfalls checklist; no validation checkpoints, but this design skill does not perform destructive/batch execution requiring them. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview body points to five one-level-deep reference files (all verified present in ./references/), each inline-signaled with a one-line "See … for …" and consolidated in a References section, giving easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |