Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable PR-prep workflow with a clear sequenced checklist and strong validation/feedback loops for CI and security. Conciseness and actionability are strong but not perfect, and progressive disclosure is good given no bundle files exist.
Suggestions
Tighten the inline security checklist into a referenced file or a more compact form to improve conciseness.
Replace 'load the skill' phrasing with exact skill-invocation paths so each quality pass is unambiguous to execute.
Consider moving the detailed CI-triage decision tree into a reference file, keeping only the decision rule inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean, terse imperative bullets that assume Claude's competence; a few inline checklists (e.g. the security checklist) could be tightened but earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (git status, pnpm --filter @novu/api-service build, gh pr create) and a precise commit-message format; minor gaps like 'load the skill' lack exact invocations. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 9-step numbered workflow with a tracked checklist, explicit validation checkpoints ('fix before push when deterministic', 'fix + add e2e coverage before opening/updating PR') and CI-triage feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly-signaled sibling-skill references (run-api-e2e-tests, enterprise-submodule); no bundle files exist, so all content is appropriately inline, though some inline checklists could be referenced out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |