testerarmy-cli

Use TesterArmy CLI to create, organize, and run dashboard-managed QA tests. Prefer saved tests, groups, project context, credentials, and remote runs over one-off local prompts. Trigger when defining regression coverage, adding QA flows, or wiring CI checks.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-structured CLI skill body with executable examples and sensible validation cues. Tightening a few prose lines and externalizing more reference material into bundle files would lift conciseness and progressive disclosure toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly lean and command-driven with little concept over-explanation, but a few prose lines (e.g. 'Default to saved dashboard tests...' and the Local Prompt caveat) could be trimmed further.	4 / 5
Actionability	Fully executable, copy-paste ready bash commands with concrete JSON payloads across creation, update, grouping, runs, and CI cover the common cases comprehensively.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Clear sectioned sequence from Setup through Runs with an 'Inspect before changing' checkpoint and coverage-claim guardrail; minor gap is the absence of an explicit failed-run retry/feedback loop.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized sections with one clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (reporting-template.md in the References table), though most reference-style material stays inline rather than being split into separate files.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states capabilities and explicit trigger conditions with low conflict risk. It could nudge specificity toward 5 by replacing the abstract 'organize' with more concrete actions.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions ('create, organize, and run dashboard-managed QA tests', 'saved tests, groups, project context, credentials, and remote runs'), but 'organize' is somewhat abstract, leaving minor coverage gaps versus a comprehensive 5.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Use TesterArmy CLI to create, organize, and run dashboard-managed QA tests') and when ('Trigger when defining regression coverage, adding QA flows, or wiring CI checks') with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	'Trigger when defining regression coverage, adding QA flows, or wiring CI checks' gives good natural-term coverage a user would say, though a few synonyms or CLI-name variants are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoped to the TesterArmy CLI with distinct QA/regression/CI triggers, giving it a clear niche with minimal overlap risk against other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: novuhq/novu
Path: .agents/skills/testerarmy-cli/SKILL.md
Commit: dc9caee

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.