Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with clear references to real bundle files, but it is noticeably verbose — it restates the description and inlines template blocks and concept explanations that duplicate the reference files and that Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Remove the restated overview paragraph and the motivational 'Tips for Success' list; the frontmatter description and the numbered workflow already convey this, so these tokens compete with context for no new information.
Move the inlined template blocks (keyword expansion patterns, difficulty factor bands, opportunity matrix, topic cluster template) into the existing reference files and replace them with one-line pointers, keeping only the core formulas and intent table inline.
Tighten the 'When This Must Trigger' section: the two consecutive lead sentences ('Use this when the conversation involves...' and 'Use this whenever the task needs reusable market intelligence...') are redundant with the description's trigger clause.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose: the body restates the description, inlines large template-style markdown blocks (keyword expansion patterns, difficulty factors, opportunity matrix, cluster templates) that duplicate the dedicated reference files, and pads with motivational "Tips for Success" and concept-level explanations Claude already knows. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance — the Opportunity formula `Opportunity = (Volume × Intent Value) / Difficulty`, an intent classification table, difficulty bands, and a report structure — though many artifacts are template placeholders rather than copy-paste-ready commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence (Understand Context → Generate Output Report) is present, with a dedicated Validation Checkpoints section covering input and output validation; minor gaps are that checkpoints are listed separately rather than inline at each step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with four real, one-level-deep reference files clearly linked in a Reference Materials section (intent taxonomy, cluster templates, prioritization framework, example report), though several of those topics are also inlined in the body rather than fully offloaded. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |