Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured verification checklist with concrete executable endpoints and a single real, clearly-signaled reference file. Its main gap is the slight duplication of the description and lack of an explicit expected-response example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and assumes Claude's competence, listing only the concrete endpoints to check without padding or explaining what discovery means. The intro sentence restates the description somewhat, a minor instance of over-explanation that keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is given as explicit HTTP endpoints ('GET /.well-known/skills/index.json') that Claude can run directly. A minor gap is the absence of an example curl or expected response shape, so it does not reach fully copy-paste-ready level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Verify Discovery' section sequences three clear checks that read like a verification checklist. There are no destructive or batch operations requiring validation feedback loops, so the destructive-cap does not apply, but no explicit expected-result verification beyond brief 'should' notes keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple skill under 50 lines with a well-organized body and a single one-level-deep reference (references/example.md) that exists as a real file and is clearly signaled via a markdown link. Per the simple-skill exception and scoring notes, this meets the level 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |