NLSpec authoring — use when you need a structured specification from multi-AI research and consensus
60
71%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/flow-spec/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required workflow reads outsider-provided free text from user answers (Step 1) and injects it into the orchestrate.sh probe query (Step 4) and then uses the resulting probe-synthesis content (Step 5/6), making the runtime LLM input dependent on outsider-authored text.
f9b8c92
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.