octopus-quick

Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks without full workflow overhead — use for small, self-contained requests

Quality

50%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/octopus-quick/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is actionable and has a clear step sequence, but it is padded with redundant restatements and inlines material that would be better split into separate reference files, and it lacks the validation checkpoint its commit-oriented workflow warrants.

Suggestions

Collapse the Benefits, Best Practices, Troubleshooting, and 'When Quick Mode Isn't Enough' sections into the When-to-Use content they restate to remove padding.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint before the atomic commit (e.g. run relevant tests / lint, or confirm the diff is limited to the intended file) so workflow clarity clears the destructive-operation cap.

Move the worked example, comparison table, and directory-structure listing into a reference file referenced one level deep from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is noticeably verbose for a 'quick' skill: the Benefits, Best Practices DO/DON'T, Troubleshooting, and 'When Quick Mode Isn't Enough' sections largely restate the When-to-Use content, and emoji decoration plus generic commit-message explanation pad the file with material Claude already knows.	2 / 5
Actionability	It provides mostly executable guidance — concrete state-manager.sh calls, a copy-pasteable summary heredoc, and example git commits — with only minor gaps such as the undefined $TASK_DESCRIPTION variable, fitting the 'mostly executable with minor gaps' anchor.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step sequence is present, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints before the atomic commit and no 'verify tests pass' loop; since commits are a batch/destructive-style operation, the missing validation cap at 3 applies even though the single-purpose flow is otherwise clear.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	With no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle files present, all content — examples, the comparison table, troubleshooting, and the directory-structure listing — is inlined into one ~360-line SKILL.md rather than split into one-level-deep referenced files, matching the 'content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined' anchor.	2 / 5
	Total	11 / 20 Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description covers both what the skill does and when to use it, but is light on concrete actions and natural trigger synonyms, leaving it moderately specified rather than sharply distinctive.

Suggestions

Add 2-3 concrete action phrases (e.g. 'apply one-file bug fixes, rename symbols, bump dependency versions') so specificity reaches the multi-action anchors.

Broaden trigger terms with user-natural synonyms like 'quick fix', 'small tweak', or 'one-line change' to improve keyword coverage.

Tighten the 'when' clause to explicit task categories so it is less likely to trigger for general small requests that overlap other skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain ('Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks') and a task shape ('small, self-contained requests') but enumerates no concrete actions, putting it just below the anchor that requires named domain plus 1-2 concrete actions.	2 / 5
Completeness	It states both what it does ('Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks without full workflow overhead') and when to use it ('use for small, self-contained requests'), though the 'when' clause could be more specific about which concrete task types qualify.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Phrases like 'ad-hoc tasks' and 'small, self-contained requests' are natural user language, but coverage is thin with no synonyms or variation beyond those, fitting the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	'Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks' is somewhat specific to a lightweight mode but the phrasing is broad enough to overlap with general coding-assist skills, matching the 'somewhat specific but could still overlap' anchor.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: nyldn/claude-octopus
Path: skills/octopus-quick/SKILL.md
Commit: 805d58c

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.