octopus-quick

Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks without full workflow overhead — use for small, self-contained requests

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-quick/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

55%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is actionable with a clear, well-sequenced workflow and concrete copy-paste commands, but it is significantly over-long for a 'quick mode' skill and inlines material that pad tokens without adding Claude-unique knowledge. Splitting reference material into bundle files and trimming redundant sections would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Cut the Benefits, Comparison table, and Troubleshooting sections — they restate concepts Claude already knows and roughly halve the token cost.

De-duplicate the escalation guidance, which appears in both 'When Quick Mode Isn't Enough' and 'Best Practices / DON'T'.

Move the full worked example and state-manager/summary shell templates into a references/ file and link to them one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~230-line body is noticeably verbose: it re-explains obvious concepts (what atomic commits are, a full Benefits section restating 'speed/cost/tracked'), repeats the escalation guidance twice (escalation section and Best Practices), and includes a large comparison table and troubleshooting section that pad the token budget without teaching Claude anything new.	2 / 5
Actionability	It provides concrete, executable shell snippets — git commit with a message template, state-manager.sh calls, and a heredoc summary generator — covering the common cases well, with only minor gaps (e.g., hardcoded execution_time of '1' is a placeholder).	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear five-step sequence (Understand → Make Change → Commit → Record in State → Generate Summary) with explicit commands and a complete worked example; it lacks a formal validate-before-commit checkpoint, but the operations are simple and non-destructive so the omission is minor.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Structure exists with clear section headers, but no bundle files are provided and all content is inlined into one long SKILL.md; the bulk (troubleshooting, comparison table, full example, benefits) that could live in separate reference files is inlined rather than split out, so navigation is only partially served.	3 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A clear, third-person description that covers both what the skill does and when to use it with natural trigger terms. Its main weakness is specificity — it describes the execution mode abstractly rather than naming the concrete actions it performs.

Suggestions

List 2-3 concrete capability types in the description (e.g., 'applies one-file bug fixes, config updates, and small refactors') to lift specificity.

Sharpen the 'when' clause with explicit trigger phrases a user would say (e.g., 'Use when the user says "quick fix" or asks for a small, known-solution change').

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('quick execution', 'ad-hoc tasks') and conveys the action (fast execution skipping workflow overhead) but lists no concrete concrete actions beyond the generic 'execution'; it stays at the domain-plus-1-2-actions level rather than enumerating multiple specific capabilities.	3 / 5
Completeness	It answers both 'what' (quick execution without full workflow overhead) and 'when' ('use for small, self-contained requests'); the 'when' clause is explicit but somewhat generic and could be more specific with concrete trigger phrases.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural, user-facing terms like 'quick execution', 'ad-hoc tasks', 'small, self-contained requests', and 'without full workflow overhead' — good coverage of phrases a user would naturally say, with only minor synonym variations missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It carves a reasonably distinct niche (lightweight ad-hoc execution vs full workflow) with minimal overlap risk against heavier workflow skills, though the generic framing leaves slight overlap with any general-purpose execution skill.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: nyldn/claude-octopus
Path: .claude/skills/skill-quick/SKILL.md
Commit: f9b8c92

Reviewed: ~11 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.