octopus-quick

Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks without full workflow overhead — use for small, self-contained requests

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-quick/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with executable commands and a complete worked example, and its workflow is clearly sequenced with an escalation path. Its weaknesses are verbosity from restated/recap sections and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure via references.

Suggestions

Remove or condense the Benefits, Quick-vs-Full comparison, Best Practices, and final Summary sections, which restate earlier guidance, to improve conciseness.

Add an explicit verification checkpoint (e.g., re-read the diff or run affected tests) before the atomic commit step to strengthen workflow_clarity.

Move long-form material (worked examples, comparison table) into a referenced bundle file and point to it from SKILL.md to introduce one-level-deep progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly efficient with concrete steps, but sections like Benefits, the Quick-vs-Full comparison table, Best Practices DO/DON'T, Troubleshooting, and the final Summary restate content Claude already has from earlier sections and add padding rather than new instruction.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides fully executable bash (state-manager.sh invocations, git commit, a heredoc summary), a concrete tool list (Edit/Write/Bash), and a complete worked typo-fix example that is copy-paste ready.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step sequence is present with an explicit escalation feedback loop, but there is no verify-before-commit checkpoint (e.g., run tests / re-read the diff) before the atomic commit, leaving validation implicit.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references; content such as the comparison table and examples that could live separately is inline.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and includes an explicit 'use for...' trigger clause, satisfying completeness. It is held back by generic trigger terms and a lack of concrete enumerated actions, leaving specificity and distinctiveness at the midpoint.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions to the description (e.g., 'implements, commits atomically, and records a summary') to raise specificity.

Include natural trigger terms users would actually say, such as 'quick fix', 'typo', or 'small refactor', to improve trigger-term quality.

Tie the when-clause to a clearer niche (e.g., 'single-file, known-solution changes') to reduce overlap with broader skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks', 'full workflow overhead') but does not enumerate concrete actions the skill performs (commit, summarize, state-record), so it is not comprehensive enough for a 3.	2 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Quick execution for ad-hoc tasks without full workflow overhead') and when ('use for small, self-contained requests'), satisfying the what-AND-when anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes some natural terms a user might say ('ad-hoc tasks', 'small, self-contained requests') but omits common variations like 'quick fix', 'typo', or 'small refactor' that would strengthen trigger matching.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The phrase 'ad-hoc tasks' and 'small, self-contained requests' is fairly broad and could overlap with general-purpose or commit skills, so it is only somewhat distinguishable.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: nyldn/claude-octopus
Path: .claude/skills/skill-quick/SKILL.md
Commit: 9f39f0c

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.