CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

skill-context-detection

Auto-detect work context (Dev vs Knowledge) — use to tailor workflows based on current task type

51

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-context-detection/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Context Detection - Internal Skill

Purpose

This skill provides automatic context detection to determine whether the user is working in a Development context (code-focused) or Knowledge context (research/strategy-focused). This replaces the manual /octo:km toggle with intelligent auto-detection.

Detection Algorithm

When a workflow skill activates, detect context using these signals:

Step 1: Check for Explicit Override

If user has explicitly set mode via /octo:km on or /octo:km off, respect that setting.

# Check if knowledge mode is explicitly set
if [[ -f ~/.claude-octopus/config/knowledge-mode ]]; then
  EXPLICIT_MODE=$(cat ~/.claude-octopus/config/knowledge-mode)
  if [[ "$EXPLICIT_MODE" == "on" ]]; then
    echo "knowledge"
    exit 0
  elif [[ "$EXPLICIT_MODE" == "off" ]]; then
    echo "dev"
    exit 0
  fi
fi
# If "auto" or not set, proceed with auto-detection

Step 2: Analyze Prompt Content (Strongest Signal)

Knowledge Context Indicators (check prompt for these terms):

  • Business/strategy: "market", "ROI", "stakeholders", "strategy", "business case", "competitive"
  • Research: "literature", "synthesis", "academic", "papers", "research question"
  • UX: "personas", "user research", "journey map", "pain points", "interviews"
  • Deliverables: "presentation", "report", "PRD", "proposal", "executive summary"

Dev Context Indicators (check prompt for these terms):

  • Technical: "API", "endpoint", "database", "function", "class", "module"
  • Actions: "implement", "debug", "refactor", "test", "deploy", "build"
  • Artifacts: "code", "tests", "migration", "schema", "controller"

Scoring:

  • Count knowledge indicators in prompt
  • Count dev indicators in prompt
  • Higher count wins
  • If tied, check project context (Step 3)

Step 3: Analyze Project Context (Secondary Signal)

Dev Project Indicators:

  • Has package.json, Cargo.toml, go.mod, pyproject.toml, pom.xml
  • Has src/, lib/, app/ directories with code files
  • Recent files are .ts, .js, .py, .go, .rs, .java

Knowledge Project Indicators:

  • Has docs/, research/, strategy/, reports/ directories
  • Majority of files are .md, .docx, .pdf, .pptx
  • No code package managers detected

Step 4: Default Fallback

If signals are ambiguous or equal:

  • In a git repo with code files → Default to Dev Context
  • No code files detected → Default to Knowledge Context

Context Output Format

Return detected context as a structured object for use by workflow skills:

{
  "context": "dev" | "knowledge",
  "confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
  "signals": {
    "prompt_indicators": ["API", "endpoint", "database"],
    "project_type": "node_typescript",
    "explicit_override": false
  }
}

How Workflow Skills Use Context

flow-discover (Research)

AspectDev ContextKnowledge Context
Research FocusTechnical implementation, library comparison, code patternsMarket analysis, academic synthesis, competitive research
Primary AgentsCodex (implementation), Gemini (ecosystem)Gemini (analysis), research-synthesizer
Output FormatCode examples, API comparisons, tech recommendationsReports, frameworks, strategic recommendations
Visual Banner🔍 [Dev] Discover Phase: Technical research🔍 [Knowledge] Discover Phase: Strategic research

flow-develop (Build)

AspectDev ContextKnowledge Context
Build FocusCode generation, implementation, architecturePRDs, strategy docs, presentations
Primary AgentsCodex (code), backend-architect, tdd-orchestratorproduct-writer, strategy-analyst, exec-communicator
Output FormatSource files, tests, migrationsDocuments, frameworks, action plans
Visual Banner🛠️ [Dev] Develop Phase: Building code🛠️ [Knowledge] Develop Phase: Building deliverables

flow-deliver (Review)

AspectDev ContextKnowledge Context
Review FocusCode quality, security, performanceDocument quality, argument strength, completeness
Primary Agentscode-reviewer, security-auditorexec-communicator, strategy-analyst
Quality GatesOWASP, test coverage, maintainabilityEvidence quality, clarity, actionability
Visual Banner✅ [Dev] Deliver Phase: Code review✅ [Knowledge] Deliver Phase: Document review

Visual Indicator Update

When context is detected, update the visual banner to show context:

Dev Context:

🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** - Multi-provider research mode
🔍 [Dev] Discover Phase: Researching OAuth implementation patterns

Providers:
🔴 Codex CLI - Technical implementation analysis
🟡 Gemini CLI - Ecosystem and library comparison
🔵 Claude - Strategic synthesis

Knowledge Context:

🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** - Multi-provider research mode
🔍 [Knowledge] Discover Phase: Researching market entry strategies

Providers:
🔴 Codex CLI - Data analysis and modeling
🟡 Gemini CLI - Market and competitive research
🔵 Claude - Strategic synthesis

Implementation in Workflow Skills

Each flow skill should:

  1. Before executing workflow, run context detection
  2. Show detected context in visual banner
  3. Adjust behavior based on context:
    • Agent selection
    • Prompt framing for external CLIs
    • Output format expectations
    • Quality gate criteria

Example Integration (Pseudocode)

When this skill activates:

1. **Detect context**
   - Analyze user's prompt for knowledge vs dev indicators
   - Check project type (code repo vs doc-heavy)
   - Check for explicit override (~/.claude-octopus/config/knowledge-mode)
   - Determine: "dev" or "knowledge" with confidence level

2. **Show context-aware banner**

🐙 CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED - Multi-provider [research|implementation|validation] mode [Phase Emoji] [Context] [Phase Name]: [Description]

Detected Context: [Dev|Knowledge] (confidence: [high|medium|low])

3. **Execute workflow with context-appropriate behavior**
- Frame prompts for external providers based on context
- Select appropriate synthesis approach
- Apply context-specific quality gates

Override Mechanism

Users can still explicitly set context when auto-detection is wrong:

# Force knowledge mode
/octo:km on

# Force dev mode  
/octo:km off

# Return to auto-detection
/octo:km auto

When explicit override is set, context detection respects it until user resets to "auto".


Confidence Levels

  • High: Strong signals in prompt AND project context agree
  • Medium: Signals in prompt OR project context (not both)
  • Low: Ambiguous signals, using fallback default

When confidence is "low", consider briefly mentioning the detected context to user:

"I detected this as a [dev/knowledge] task. If that's wrong, you can use /octo:km to override."


Testing Context Detection

To verify context detection is working:

  1. In a code repository, ask "octo research caching patterns" → Should detect Dev Context
  2. In same repo, ask "octo research market opportunities" → Should detect Knowledge Context
  3. With /octo:km on set, ask "octo research API patterns" → Should use Knowledge Context (explicit override)

Proactive Skill Suggestions

When detecting the user's work stage, surface relevant command suggestions:

Detected ContextSuggestion
Brainstorming / exploring ideasConsider /octo:brainstorm for structured ideation
Reviewing a plan or strategyConsider /octo:plan for strategic planning
Debugging errors or failuresConsider /octo:debug for systematic investigation
Writing or running testsConsider /octo:tdd for test-driven development
Code review before mergeUse Claude-native /review for ordinary review; suggest /octo:review for multi-AI escalation
Ready to deploy or shipConsider /octo:deliver for quality-gated delivery
Researching a topicConsider /octo:research for multi-source synthesis
Working on securityUse Claude-native /security-review for ordinary security review; suggest /octo:security for escalated OWASP or adversarial audit

Suggestion Format

Suggestions should be non-intrusive, appended as a brief note:

💡 Tip: You appear to be debugging — `/octo:debug` provides systematic investigation with multi-AI support.

Persistent Opt-Out

  • If user says "stop suggesting" or "no more tips": set OCTO_PROACTIVE_SUGGESTIONS=off in .claude-octopus/preferences.json
  • If user says "be proactive" or "turn on tips": set OCTO_PROACTIVE_SUGGESTIONS=on
  • Check preference at suggestion time — never suggest when opted out
  • Respect current mode: dev mode suggestions differ from knowledge work suggestions

Re-Enable Suggestions

Users who previously opted out can re-enable suggestions at any time:

  • Say "be proactive", "turn on tips", or "enable suggestions"
  • Manually edit ~/.claude-octopus/preferences.json and set OCTO_PROACTIVE_SUGGESTIONS to on
  • Default state (no preference set) is suggestions enabled

Detection Signals

Detect work stage from:

  • Recent tool usage (many Bash calls = likely implementing/debugging)
  • File types being edited (.test.ts = testing, .md = documentation)
  • Error patterns in recent output (stack traces = debugging)
  • Git state (uncommitted changes = implementing, clean tree = ready to review/ship)
Repository
nyldn/claude-octopus
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.