Structured multi-provider AI debates between Claude and available advisors — use for critical decisions
50
56%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Critical
Do not install without reviewing
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-debate/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 critical severity finding. Installing this skill is not recommended: please review these findings carefully if you do intend to do so.
Detected a suspicious URL in the skill instructions that could lead the agent to download and execute malicious scripts or binaries. This includes links to executables from untrusted sources, typosquatting of official packages, URL shorteners that obscure the destination, and personal file hosting services.
This is a personal GitHub repository (not an official vendor/CDN) referenced as the skill source and it contains scripts/CLI instructions that, if pulled and executed, could run arbitrary code — making it a potentially suspicious distribution vector unless the author and repo are verified.
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
In SKILL.md, the workflow takes the user-authored `/debate` question/context (including optional file-derived content) and passes it as free text to multiple external advisors via `orchestrate.sh spawn` in Step 5 (e.g., embedding `DEBATE QUESTION: ${QUESTION}` and `${CONTEXT}` directly into the advisor prompt).
9f39f0c
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.