Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is highly actionable with concrete, executable bash throughout and a clear four-step sequence. Its weaknesses are repeated setup boilerplate that inflates token cost and the absence of explicit validation checkpoints and external reference structure.
Suggestions
Factor the repeated SLUG/DESIGNS_DIR/mkdir setup into a single defined snippet referenced from each step to remove the verbatim duplication.
Add explicit verification gates — e.g., confirm the saved file exists and its frontmatter parses, and verify a supersedes target actually exists before linking.
Consider moving the design-document template and integration-notes sections into a referenced file to shorten the main body and add one-level-deep navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no concept-over-explanation, but the SLUG/DESIGNS_DIR/mkdir setup block is repeated verbatim across Step 1, Step 2, Step 4, and the Caps section, a clear tightening opportunity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every section provides concrete, executable bash (filename resolution, save heredoc, grep discovery, revision-chain walk, cap check) that is copy-paste ready with specific examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–4 are clearly sequenced with concrete commands, but there are no explicit validation or error-recovery checkpoints (e.g., verify the saved file parses, confirm supersedes target exists), leaving checkpoints implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and there are no broken nested references, but the single ~277-line file keeps the template and integration notes inline with no one-level-deep references to split material, fitting the some-structure anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |