Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a strong, executable orchestration workflow with excellent sequencing and validation, but it is verbose with repeated prohibition lists and inlines content that would benefit from being split into reference files.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the prohibition list — state it once in the "Prohibited Actions" section and reference it from Step 5 rather than repeating.
Move the long Step 4.5 QA adversary prompt and the ASCII banner into a reference file (e.g., references/scenario-gate.md) and link to it.
Tighten "MANDATORY" / "CANNOT SKIP" emphasis, which is repeated across nearly every step and adds tokens without new information.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but carries notable redundancy — prohibition lists are repeated across Step 5's HARD-GATE, the "Prohibited Actions" section, and "Error Handling", and Step 4.5 inlines a long QA prompt that could be referenced. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable bash commands and flags appear throughout (orchestrate.sh factory --spec, find-based report/score discovery, state-manager.sh calls), with only minor gaps from placeholder substitution like <spec_path>. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence with multiple validation gates (Steps 3, 6, 7), per-step error-handling feedback loops, and a hard gate prohibiting substitution or skipping. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Headers give some structure, but no bundle reference files exist and the bulk (banner, full QA adversary prompt) is inlined; the one external pointer to codex-host-adapter.md is not clearly signaled as a reference split. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |