Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clearly sequenced, actionable instruction skill with verbatim prompts and a scoring rubric. Its main weaknesses are mild verbosity in the rationale/host blocks and references to bundle files that are not present.
Suggestions
Tighten or move the Codex host-adapter block and the adversarial-review rationale into a reference file so the main body stays lean.
Either create the referenced `skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md` and `prd.md` bundle files, or remove/inline those references so navigation is not dangling.
Add a brief explicit validation step in Phase 4 (e.g. confirm the saved file parses / sections are non-empty) to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The phase-based bulleted structure is mostly lean, but the adversarial-review rationale ("A single-model PRD has blind spots...") and the Codex host-adapter block are mild padding Claude does not need. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready guidance: verbatim clarification questions, a verbatim adversarial-dispatch prompt, and a concrete 100-point scoring framework with point allocations. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0–4 are explicitly sequenced with checkpoints (WAIT for user response in Phase 0, score-then-save, and a revise-after-challenge loop in Phase 2.5). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but references `skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md` and a `prd.md` command that do not exist in any bundle directory, leaving navigation dangling. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |