The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but the Safety Measures table, Red Flags table, and "The Bottom Line" restate the steps, and the `git checkout <tag> -- .` behavior is re-explained; not 3 because of this padding, not 1 because it avoids teaching general git concepts.

It provides fully executable bash commands throughout (e.g. `git tag -l "octo-checkpoint-*"`, `git diff --name-status HEAD $CHECKPOINT_TAG`, `git checkout $CHECKPOINT_TAG -- .`) with clear placeholders; not 2 because these are copy-paste ready, not pseudocode.

Eight clearly sequenced steps include tag-existence validation with an explicit STOP, a mandatory "ROLLBACK" confirmation gate, and a pre-rollback safety checkpoint forming a feedback loop for a destructive operation; not 2 because validation checkpoints are explicit, not implicit.

No bundle files exist and the skill is a single ~260-line file; it is well-sectioned but monolithic with no one-level-deep references; not 3 because no content is split across files, not 1 because sectioning is clear and not deeply nested.

"Roll back to a previous checkpoint via git" names the git domain and one concrete action, but does not list multiple specific actions as the top anchor requires; not 1 because it is concrete rather than vague.

It states both what it does ("Roll back to a previous checkpoint via git") and an explicit when ("use when a change went wrong and you need to revert"); not 2 because the trigger is explicit, not merely implied.

"rollback", "revert", "checkpoint", and "change went wrong" are natural phrases a user would say when needing this skill, giving good coverage; not 2 because it offers more than a single keyword.

"Checkpoint rollback via git" is a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not 2 because the checkpoint/rollback framing is specific rather than broadly overlapping.