Build a behavior change with observed red, minimal green, and measured test consolidation
62
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-tdd/SKILL.mdRead skills/blocks/engineering-method-selection.md from the installed plugin
for review admission. Natural-language requests and --peer-review share that
policy. Honor host-only requests; risk alone does not authorize paid usage.
Run the red, green, and refactor cycle on the current host. Routine TDD makes
zero additional provider dispatches. Use one external reviewer only when the
user passes --peer-review, explicitly requests independent review, or an
existing risk policy requires it. Explicit debate, council, and multi-model
commands retain their own execution contracts.
Do not change production behavior until a focused test fails for the expected reason. Existing implementation outside the requested change remains intact.
If a test passes before implementation, it is not red evidence. If it errors due to fixture or syntax problems, repair the test until it fails on the missing behavior.
Do not equate similar assertions with duplicate guarantees. Keep separate OS,
security, cancellation, and integration boundaries. For every removed test,
record old_test, behavior, replacement, mutant, red_observed,
baseline_ms, candidate_ms, and reason. The retained test must kill the
named mutant at the intended caller boundary.
After one warm-up, measure five isolated runs and report every sample and the median. Review a slowdown only when it exceeds both 20 percent and 100 ms.
Completion requires observed red and green evidence, affected-suite results, and the consolidation ledger when tests were removed. A missing reviewer is reported as incomplete review, never simulated.
If the same test remains red after two implementation attempts, stop and recheck the test boundary, fixture, and expected behavior. The strategy-rotation hook is a signal to try a fundamentally different hypothesis, not another variation of the same patch.
Adapted from DEEPENING in mattpocock/skills at commit
3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See
THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.
0093dab
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.