CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

skill-visual-feedback

Process screenshot-based UI/UX feedback to fix visual issues — use when users share screenshots of bugs

60

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/skill-visual-feedback/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill has a strong, well-sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, but it is verbose with placeholder scaffolding and offers no progressive disclosure into reference files despite its length.

Suggestions

Replace placeholder output templates with a single concrete worked example per phase to raise actionability and cut length.

Move Common Patterns and Best Practices into a reference file (e.g., references/patterns.md) linked from the body, and fix or remove the dangling codex-host-adapter.md reference.

Trim redundant template markdown blocks so every remaining token earns its place in the context window.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~440-line body is padded with placeholder markdown templates (e.g., "[Issue 1: e.g., Button styles inconsistent]") that Claude would naturally produce; it avoids concept-padding but could be tightened considerably.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete Glob/Grep patterns (e.g., "**/*settings*.{tsx,jsx,ts,js,vue,svelte}") and named tools are present, but the core fix guidance is placeholder templates ("Change: [what to change]") rather than copy-paste-ready instruction.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-phase sequence (Visual Analysis → Code Investigation → Root Cause Analysis → Implementation → Verification) with a verification checklist and an explicit user-confirmation feedback loop; batch "fix everywhere" operations are followed by verification so the cap does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single monolithic file with no actual reference/script/asset bundles, and its one cross-reference (skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md) points to a non-existent file; internally well-sectioned but nothing is offloaded to one-level-deep references.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is well-formed with a clear what-and-when structure and a distinct, low-conflict niche. It is held back only by slightly thin action specificity and missing common trigger-term variations.

Suggestions

List a couple more concrete actions (e.g., "analyze the screenshot, locate the responsible components, and apply a systematic fix") to lift specificity to 3.

Add natural phrasings users say ("looks wrong", "messy UI", "not styled right") alongside "screenshots of bugs" to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Process screenshot-based UI/UX feedback to fix visual issues" names the domain and a couple of actions but does not list multiple specific concrete actions (e.g., analyze image, locate code, apply systematic fix) as a score-3 anchor would.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states both what it does ("Process screenshot-based UI/UX feedback to fix visual issues") and an explicit when ("use when users share screenshots of bugs"), matching the what-AND-when anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "screenshots", "UI/UX feedback", "visual issues", and "bugs" appear, but common variations users actually say (e.g., "looks wrong", "messy UI", "styled wrong") are missing, so coverage is incomplete.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The screenshot-based visual-feedback niche is specific and the trigger (users sharing screenshots of bugs) is distinct, making conflict with other skills unlikely.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
nyldn/claude-octopus
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.