Conciseness

Mostly dense and operational, but with real repetition that could be tightened: the 'never HEAD~1' warning is stated verbatim twice (Handle the report and Review the task), the ledger-survives-compaction rationale appears three times (Setup, Task Loop intro, Common Rationalizations), 'never pause between tasks' recurs in three sections, and Model Selection overlaps with the complexity-signals list. This fits anchor 3 ('mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened') rather than anchor 4, where over-explanation would be only minor instances.

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: exact commands with arguments ('bash scripts/sdd-workspace PLAN_FILE', 'bash scripts/task-brief PLAN_FILE N', 'bash scripts/review-package PLAN_FILE BASE HEAD'), exact ledger line formats ('Task <N>: complete (commits <base7>..<head7>, review clean)'), a five-part dispatch composition recipe, a four-status report taxonomy, and even a no-bash fallback ('git log --oneline, git diff --stat, and git diff -U10 ... redirected to one uniquely named file'). This matches anchor 5 — copy-paste ready commands covering the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is explicit and graphed (Setup → per-task loop → final review), with validation gates at every task (spec ✅ AND quality, never skipped), a fix loop with a round cap, a breaker, and a scoped re-review every round, explicit four-stop conditions, ledger recovery, and a resumption procedure. This matches anchor 5 exactly: clear sequence, explicit validation steps, feedback loops for error recovery, and checklists — the destructive/batch cap does not apply because validation is pervasive.

Progressive Disclosure

The split itself is good — seven clearly signaled one-level-deep references (fix-loop, preflight, final-review, etc.) plus three scripts, loaded at point of need. But scoring against the actual bundle: three referenced paths do not exist — 'implementer-prompt.md' and 'task-reviewer-prompt.md' are cited from the body ('Template: [implementer-prompt.md](implementer-prompt.md)' and inside the process graph) and 're-review-prompt.md' is cited from fix-loop.md/final-review.md. Navigation dead-ends at the per-task templates the whole workflow depends on, which is more than anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps'; anchor 3's 'some structure but could be better organized' is the closest fit.

Specificity

The description names the domain ("executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session") but contains no concrete actions whatsoever — nothing about dispatching fresh subagents per task, per-task reviews, or a whole-branch final review. It fits anchor 2 (domain named, actions absent/minimal); it is not anchor 3 because no 1-2 concrete actions are listed, and not anchor 1 because "executing implementation plans" is a concrete domain, not pure abstraction.

Completeness

Only a 'when' clause is present ("Use when executing...") with no statement of what the skill does — the dispatch-per-task/review/final-review mechanism appears nowhere. This exactly matches anchor 2 ('only when is present without what', e.g. "Use when working with documents"); it cannot be 3 because a clear 'what' is absent, and not 1 because the 'when' is concrete rather than extremely vague.

Trigger Term Quality

"executing implementation plans", "independent tasks", and "current session" are phrases a user would plausibly say, but coverage is thin — missing "subagent", "delegate/dispatch", "spec", and "run the plan" variants. Anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations) is the closest fit; it does not reach anchor 4's 'good keyword coverage'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The trigger is moderately specific, but the body itself names a sibling skill ('executing-plans', inline execution) that would fire on the same phrase, and the description omits the differentiator (per-task subagent dispatch). Anchor 3 ('somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills') fits; anchor 4 would require distinct triggers that clearly separate it from the closely related inline-execution skill.