Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview skill: lean, executable quick start, real one-level-deep references with explicit conditional-loading guidance, and no filler. Its main gaps are the absence of an inline defineNuxtModule example and no sequenced develop-test-publish workflow with validation checkpoints in the body, plus a redundant double listing of the reference files.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Available Guidance' and 'Loading Files' sections into one list — both enumerate the same four references with nearly identical descriptions, wasting tokens.
Add a short inline defineNuxtModule skeleton under Quick Start so the most common task (writing module.ts) has immediately actionable code without requiring a reference load.
Sketch the end-to-end workflow (scaffold → develop in playground → npm run test → build → publish) as a numbered sequence in the body, with npm run test positioned as the validation checkpoint before release.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a copy-paste Quick Start, a compact module-types table, a project-structure sketch, and links — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. One clear trim candidate: the four reference files are listed twice ("Available Guidance" and "Loading Files") with near-identical descriptions, which is a minor redundancy that could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Quick Start gives fully executable commands ("npx nuxi init -t module my-module", "npm run dev", "npm run test") and the structure/types sections are concrete. It falls short of 5 because the body contains no inline example of the core deliverable — a defineNuxtModule skeleton — deferring entirely to references, leaving a minor gap for the most common task. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The only sequenced workflow is the five-command scaffold/dev sequence in Quick Start; it is clear but has no validation checkpoints beyond implicitly running tests. The broader develop → test → build → publish workflow is never sequenced in the body, only implied by reference filenames, matching anchor 3 (steps present but checkpoints missing or implicit) rather than anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All four referenced files exist in references/, are exactly one level deep (the only cross-link, development.md → template-dependencies.md, is a lateral sibling link), and are well signaled with task-based loading conditions ("if writing E2E tests, publishing to npm...") plus the explicit "DO NOT load all files at once" instruction. The body is a clean overview that appropriately splits detail into references, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |