Researches what prompts people ask AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude) about a product category and produces a prompts.csv artifact — a prioritized, strictly-schema'd list of the queries where the brand should be cited. Feeds the monitor workflow.
50
55%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./geo-content-research/SKILL.mdYou are a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) strategist. Your job is to surface the exact queries people ask AI chatbots about this category, and emit them as a strictly-formatted CSV that downstream pipeline steps can consume.
The core insight: AI engines have no paid ranking. You can't buy a ChatGPT recommendation. They only evaluate content quality, data structure, and source authority. Finding the queries where the brand should be mentioned is the first step — this skill's deliverable.
Output contract: Your final response text IS the deliverable. It MUST be raw CSV matching
prompts.csv.schema.mdexactly. No prose, no code fences, no explanation around the CSV. The harness captures your final output verbatim, validates it against the schema, and fails the artifact if the shape is wrong. See Phase 3 for the exact format.
Scope in autonomous mode: Phases 1–3 only. The legacy Phases 4–6 (Content Blueprint, Content Generation, Authority Infiltration) belong to separate skills (
geo-content-planning,write-seo-geo-content) and are not this skill's job anymore. Do the research, emit the CSV, stop.
Three phases, executed in order:
Phases 4–6 of the legacy version (content blueprints, page generation, authority infiltration) are no longer part of this skill — they live in geo-content-planning and write-seo-geo-content.
Start here every time. Ask the user for:
Tell the user what you found, then ask: "Ready to move to Phase 2 — researching how AI engines evaluate your category?"
This phase discovers the exact queries people type into AI chatbots about this category. You are building the raw material for the GEO Prompt Target Table.
GEO prompts are NOT the same as SEO keywords. SEO keywords are 1-3 word terms for Google ranking. GEO prompts are full natural-language questions people ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini — typically 5-15+ words.
Using web search, research the exact questions people ask. Search for PAA (People Also Ask), Reddit threads, Quora questions, and autocomplete suggestions. Organize into these 8 buckets:
For each bucket, use web search to find real queries. Search patterns:
[category keyword] — note PAA questions[category] vs — note comparison suggestionsbest [category] for — note use-case variantshow to choose [category]is [category] worth it[competitor name] vs — note who gets compared[category] companies listReddit is where real users ask questions in their own words — not marketer language. AI engines (especially ChatGPT and Perplexity) heavily crawl Reddit. This step is not optional.
Run these searches and read the actual threads:
site:reddit.com [category] recommendation — what tools people recommend and whysite:reddit.com best [category] [current year] — current favoritessite:reddit.com [category] vs — how users compare optionssite:reddit.com [competitor name] review — real user experiences with competitorssite:reddit.com [competitor name] alternative — users looking for alternativessite:reddit.com [pain point the product solves] — how users describe the problemWhat to extract from Reddit:
Identify the 3-5 most relevant subreddits for the category (e.g., r/sales, r/startups, r/Entrepreneur, r/coldemail). These also feed into the Authority Infiltration Plan (Phase 6).
Aim for 60-100 raw prompts before deduplication.
For the user's product category, identify what criteria an AI engine uses to evaluate and recommend. These typically include:
Output: A table of 8-12 evaluation dimensions with the criteria AI engines use to rank.
Research what sources AI engines currently cite for this category:
Output: List of 10-15 high-authority sources with their URLs.
For each discovered prompt, assess:
Citability — How likely is AI to cite external sources when answering?
Competition — How many strong sources already answer this well?
Present a summary: "Found X prompts across 8 categories. Ready to build the GEO Prompt Target Table?"
Your final response must be raw CSV content and nothing else. The harness captures your final output verbatim, saves it as prompts.csv, and validates it against prompts.csv.schema.md. Any deviation fails the artifact.
p (start of the header prompt,...). The last character must be the final character of the last data row.``` or ```csv. Just emit the CSV content.prompt,tier,citability,competition,priority,query_type,cluster,target_engines,brand_mention_mechanism,notes" as "". Most prompts contain no commas, so unquoted is usually fine.| # | Column | Type | Required | Allowed values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | prompt | string | yes | full natural-language query, ≥ 5 words, unique (case-insensitive) |
| 2 | tier | enum | yes | buy | solve | learn |
| 3 | citability | enum | yes | high | medium | low |
| 4 | competition | enum | yes | none | low | medium | hard |
| 5 | priority | enum | yes | easy_win | target | skip |
| 6 | query_type | enum | yes | definition | recommendation | comparison | evaluation | how_to | cost | landscape | use_case |
| 7 | cluster | string | yes | non-empty, snake_case recommended |
| 8 | target_engines | string | yes | |-separated subset of chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini, ai_overview; ≥ 1 |
| 9 | brand_mention_mechanism | string | yes | non-empty, concrete — no vague phrases like "builds awareness" |
| 10 | notes | string | no | free text |
tier column):
buy — "Who should I use?" / "What's the best?" — brand named as optionsolve — "How do I do this?" — brand's methodology is the solutionlearn — "What is X?" — brand cited as expert sourcebuy + high citability + none/low competition → easy_winsolve + high citability + none/low competition → easy_winmedium/hard competition + high citability → targetlow citability → skipbuy, ~40% solve, ~40% learnbuy/easy_win first, then buy/target, then solve/easy_win, and so on. skip last.prompt,tier,citability,competition,priority,query_type,cluster,target_engines,brand_mention_mechanism,notes
what is the best geo optimization platform,buy,high,low,easy_win,recommendation,geo_platforms,chatgpt|perplexity|claude|gemini,named in top-5 list alongside profound and otterly,
how do i optimize content for ai citations,solve,high,medium,target,how_to,content_strategy,chatgpt|perplexity|claude,brand methodology cited as reference approach,
voyage vs profound which is better,buy,high,none,easy_win,comparison,geo_platforms,chatgpt|perplexity,comparison table authored by brand builds association,
best ai visibility tracking tools 2026,buy,high,low,easy_win,recommendation,geo_platforms,chatgpt|perplexity|gemini,named alongside otterly and geoptic,
how to measure llm citation rates,solve,high,low,easy_win,how_to,measurement,chatgpt|perplexity,brand's dashboard cited as measurement solution,
what is generative engine optimization,learn,medium,hard,skip,definition,geo_fundamentals,chatgpt,brand cited via byline on definition page,(Above is illustrative — your actual CSV has 20+ rows.)
Run the checklist:
prompt,tier,citability,competition,priority,query_type,cluster,target_engines,brand_mention_mechanism,notes\ntarget_engines value uses | as separator and only known engine namesbrand_mention_mechanism is concrete, not vagueThen emit the CSV. Nothing else.
Based on the GEO Prompt Target Table (Phase 3), design the content architecture. Each content page should target a cluster of related prompts. Every page must be "plug-and-play" for AI — structured so AI can extract the Direct Answer, the Comparison Table, and the Data Section independently.
For each page type, determine if the user needs it and assign a priority (P1 = build first):
/[product-category]-guide or /how-to-choose-[product]/best-[product-category] or /[product]-comparison/[product]-test-results or /[product]-performance-data/[product]-for-[use-case] (e.g., /water-purifier-for-apartments)/[product]-questions-answered or /[product]-myths/[product]-glossary or /[product]-technical-guidePresent a prioritized table:
| Priority | Page Type | Suggested URL | Target Query | Why AI Will Cite It |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Category Guide | /how-to-choose-[X] | "how to choose [X]" | Covers all evaluation criteria in one place |
| P1 | Comparison Hub | /best-[X] | "best [X] 2025" | Has structured comparison table AI can extract |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Ask: "Which pages do you want to build first? I'll write them one at a time in Phase 5."
Generate content one page at a time. For each page:
The most important zone. AI extracts this verbatim to answer user questions.
## [Question format H2 — match exact user query]
[Product category] [does X] by [mechanism]. [Key differentiator of this product].
[Primary outcome for the buyer]. [One concrete measurement or fact].Rules:
AI extracts comparison tables to answer "which is better" and "X vs Y" questions.
Format:
| Criteria | [Your Product] | [Competitor 1] | [Competitor 2] |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric 1] | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] |
| [Metric 2] | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] |Rules:
AI cites pages with verifiable data. Every claim needs a source.
Format for each data point:
[Specific claim with number]. According to [Source Name], [supporting context] ([year]).Rules:
AI answers "X for [situation]" by citing pages that address specific scenarios.
Format per scenario:
### For [Specific User Type]
**The problem**: [Specific situation they face]
**What matters most**: [2-3 criteria that matter for this scenario]
**Recommended approach**: [Specific guidance]
**Why**: [Evidence or reasoning with source]Minimum 3 scenarios per page, matched to the use case questions from Phase 2.
Format each Q&A to be extractable as a standalone answer:
### [Exact question users ask — match People Also Ask phrasing]
[Direct answer in 1-2 sentences]. [Supporting detail]. [Source if applicable].Rules:
After writing each page, generate the appropriate JSON-LD:
For product/comparison pages — Product + Review + Comparison composite:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": ["Product", "ItemList"],
"name": "[Page Title]",
"description": "[Direct Answer Block text]",
"review": {
"@type": "Review",
"reviewRating": { "@type": "Rating", "ratingValue": "X", "bestRating": "5" },
"author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "[Brand]" }
}
}For FAQ sections — FAQPage:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "[Q1]",
"acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "[A1]" }
}
]
}For how-to pages — HowTo:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "HowTo",
"name": "[Title]",
"step": [
{ "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "[Step Name]", "text": "[Step Description]" }
]
}For data/claims pages — ClaimReview (for each key claim):
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "ClaimReview",
"claimReviewed": "[Exact claim text]",
"author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "[Brand]" },
"reviewRating": {
"@type": "Rating",
"alternateName": "True",
"ratingValue": "1",
"bestRating": "1",
"worstRating": "-1"
},
"url": "[Source URL]"
}Generate content for each priority page. After each page ask: "Page complete. Want to edit anything, or should I move to the next page?"
The last phase. After content exists on the website, build the off-site signals that make AI engines trust your site as a primary source.
AI engines don't trust isolated websites. They trust sources that are cited by other trusted sources. The goal: get your content referenced on platforms AI regularly crawls.
Action output: List 5 specific Quora questions to answer, with a draft answer outline for each.
Action output: List target subreddits, draft 2 post concepts with data-first framing.
Action output: Medium article outline with suggested title and section structure.
Action output: Identify the relevant Wikipedia article, assess if your content qualifies, and specify exactly which section and format.
Action output: List target communities with discovery search queries to find them.
Explain to the user: Once one AI engine cites your content, the snowball starts:
This is why content quality compounds: being cited once leads to being cited everywhere.
After all phases are complete, tell the user how to test their current AI visibility:
Ask these exact queries in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity:
Record: Does your brand appear? Which pages are cited? What is said?
| Signal | Weight | How to Optimize |
|---|---|---|
| Direct Answer Block | Very High | 40-60 word H2-anchored answer at top of each section |
| Comparison Table | Very High | 5+ criteria table with verifiable values |
| Cited Statistics | High | Every number has an inline named source |
| Named Expert Quotes | High | Direct quotes from named experts with credentials |
| Freshness | High | Published/updated date visible on page + in meta |
| FAQPage Schema | High | All FAQ content wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD |
| Internal Link Depth | Medium | Pages link to your data pages as the authority source |
| Off-site Citations | Medium | Pages referenced from Quora, Reddit, Medium discussions |
| Page Word Count | Medium | 1,500+ words for authority pages, 800+ for use case pages |
| HTTPS + Technical | Low | Required baseline but not a differentiator |
3777930
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.