Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers exceptionally concrete, well-sequenced operational guidance with strong validation discipline for a risky bridging task. Its weaknesses are verbosity/repetition in the discipline and error sections, and a lack of progressive disclosure — everything lives in one ~150-line SKILL.md with no external reference files.
Suggestions
Move the detailed channel/lifecycle troubleshooting and the recovery-contract material (Runtime.evaluate budgets, fingerprint checks, daemon vs stdio rules) into a references/ file (e.g. LIFECYCLE.md) and reference it one level deep, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview.
Tighten the '结果优先的调用纪律' 8-point list and drop or dedupe the '常见错误' section, which restates rules already covered above; consolidate to reduce token cost.
Add at least one fully-specified example call per mode (with real argument shapes and the expected return fields to consume) so the actionability reaches copy-paste-ready coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and densely packed with non-obvious operational knowledge (tool names, receipt semantics, recovery budgets), but the 8-point '结果优先的调用纪律' list, the '常见错误' section, and several redundant caveats repeat points already made elsewhere and could be tightened. Not a 4 because the over-explanation and repetition are more than minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: names specific tools (chat_completion, wait_reply, get_conversation, runtime_info, get_send_status), fields (conversation_id, delivery_stage, reply_persisted, retry_after, out_file, file_sha256, operation_id, session_key), a copy-able C-mode envelope, and exact budgets (15s reconnect, 8s receipt check, contract version 2026-09-19.2). Not a 5 because full call signatures with arguments are only sketched (e.g. the A-mode `chat_completion(message="继续", conversation_id=C)`), leaving minor execution gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four modes are clearly sequenced with explicit round shapes and termination conditions, and the skill is built around explicit validation checkpoints (consume the full return value, check delivery_stage/receipt, check tail in_progress before any next send) plus feedback loops (timeout → receipt/tail read → recover with same conversation_id, never auto-resend) and a '常见错误' checklist. Destructive/send operations are gated by verification, so the destructive-cap at 3 does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file has good internal structure (## sections, tables, a mode-selection matrix) but is ~150 lines with no bundle files in references/, scripts/, or assets/ — all detailed material (channel/lifecycle troubleshooting, the 8-point discipline, the recovery contract) is inlined in one file. The under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply, and content that arguably belongs in separate referenced files is inline, matching the 3 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |