Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable governance skill with a clear numbered workflow, a decision-record template, and explicit acceptance criteria. Its main weaknesses are some verbosity in the canonical intent-resolution section and a dangling reference to a non-existent examples file.
Suggestions
Tighten the '意图解析策略（Canonical）' section into bullets or a compact table to cut token weight while preserving the rules.
Make the validation step an explicit feedback loop ('validate → if fail, fix and re-validate → only proceed when valid') to push workflow clarity higher.
Either add the referenced examples/ambiguous-restructure.md or remove the link so progressive disclosure points only to real files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of generic concept explanations Claude already knows, but the long '意图解析策略（Canonical）' block restates governance/confirmation rules at length and the multi-clause sentences could be tightened, placing it at mostly-efficient with some padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable guidance — a numbered workflow, a decision-record template with explicit fields, and a three-tier request classification (audit/change/high-risk) — with only minor gaps (no literal example of a recorded 'assumption' entry or a sample question). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit checkpoint ('只有缺失信息确实阻止继续时才提一个关键问题') and a validation section listing observable acceptance conditions; it stops short of 5 because the validate→fix→retry feedback loop is implied rather than spelled out as an explicit retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good with well-labeled sections and a one-level-deep reference ([ambiguous-restructure.md](examples/ambiguous-restructure.md)); however the referenced examples/ directory does not exist in the bundle, so the single reference points to a missing file, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |