Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly executable operations runbook with a clear numbered workflow and a strong read-only safety boundary. It is concise and actionable, with only minor gaps in exact command coverage and feedback-loop explicitness.
Suggestions
Give step 5 (Governance/Proposals) explicit invocations for capability_gov.py and static_gov.py instead of just naming the files, matching the precision of the other steps.
Add an explicit fail→classify→retry note for check-script failures (not found / permission / sandbox / timeout) so the workflow's handling of OBSERVABILITY_EVIDENCE_LIMITATION is a visible feedback loop rather than only described in the contract.
Reduce repetition between the 核心契约 classification rules and the 工作流程 steps by cross-referencing the contract from the workflow instead of restating status/evidence_state semantics.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and mostly operational, assuming infrastructure knowledge rather than re-explaining concepts; minor repetition between the core-contract section and the workflow could be tightened. Not a 5 because the contracts restate classification logic already implied by the workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (aic validate, aic diff <target>, rpo_check.py --json, personalization_status.py --json) and an output template; step 5 only names capability_gov.py / static_gov.py without exact invocations, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered 7-step sequence with the Evidence Freshness contract and Overall Action Resolver acting as validation/checkpoint logic; read-only scope means the destructive-cap does not apply, but no explicit feedback (fail→fix→retry) loops are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned (~120 lines) with one-level-deep inline references to real bundle scripts in scripts/ (personalization_status.py, behavior_metrics.py, extract_user_msgs.py); organization is good but references are inline path mentions rather than formally signaled 'See X for details' links. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |