Content
66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and secure by design, with an exemplary validated export/restore workflow (scan → FAIL/stop, check → apply → re-verify). Its main weaknesses are that it never surfaces the bundle — no pointer to references/manifest.md or the sync_dsh_config.py script — leaving the guidance not directly executable.
Suggestions
Add the concrete invocation for the bundled tool, e.g. 'python scripts/sync_dsh_config.py --check / --apply / export [--template] [--with-optional]', in the 打包 and 恢复 sections so the named modes and flags are executable.
Replace or trim the inline 纳入/排除 table and link to references/manifest.md (e.g. '完整清单与敏感扫描规则见 [manifest.md](references/manifest.md)') to remove the duplication and surface the bundle file.
Consolidate the forced-exclusion rules (.credentials.yaml / sessions / storages) into one authoritative place (the table or 安全边界) to cut the repetition across three sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — tables for include/exclude and template placeholders, no explanation of what SHA-256 or sanitization is. It is not a 5 because the exclusion rules are stated three times (table '强制排除', the 安全边界 section, and export step 2) and the inline 纳入/排除 table duplicates references/manifest.md, so minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Modes and flags are named in prose ('--template', '--with-optional', check/apply/export, SHA-256, manifest.json), but the body never shows how to invoke the tool — scripts/sync_dsh_config.py is never mentioned and there is no command line anywhere. This is concrete-but-incomplete guidance with missing key execution details, matching anchor 3 rather than anchor 4's 'concrete code or commands'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Export (steps 1–7) and restore (steps 1–4) are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: sensitive scan after copy marks the package FAIL and stops; restore is read-only check first, then explicit apply, then a re-check with SHA-256 verification; PASS requires clean post-apply verification, with PARTIAL for non-blocking diffs. This matches anchor 5 exactly, and the destructive/batch cap does not apply since validation is present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Two bundle files exist (references/manifest.md, scripts/sync_dsh_config.py) but the body references neither: the 纳入/排除 table inlines what references/manifest.md already covers instead of pointing to it, and the flags imply a script that is never linked. Section structure is good, so it is above anchor 2's 'minimal structure', but the references are effectively buried/absent, keeping it below anchor 3's 'references present but not clearly signaled'. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |